Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why have we had soldiers in Afghanistan for almost 4 years now?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:16 PM
Original message
Poll question: Why have we had soldiers in Afghanistan for almost 4 years now?
Edited on Fri Nov-04-05 01:22 PM by NNN0LHI

edited for a typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Other:
They're after Osama, remember? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. To build permanent bases along the natural gas pipeline route, of course..
Edited on Fri Nov-04-05 01:22 PM by drb
http://atimes.com/c-asia/DA25Ag01.html

So the correct answer is (b) and (c), not shown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. One 2008 Presidential Candidate agrees with your conclusion
Edited on Fri Nov-04-05 02:14 PM by JohnyCanuck
Time To Take Back America From The Democrats And The GOP
From Karl W B Schwarz

Our Constitution, our freedoms and civil liberties have all been altered because of 9-11, an investigation that has been covered up by the Bush Administration and Congress. They have even covered up the Cheney Energy Task Force, where we suspect that it was discussed that the landlocked oil deals in Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan would not be landlocked much longer - as Cheney and Bush intended to take control of the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline, or TAP as it is called, with military force.

That pipeline was under contract from Turkmenistan, through Afghanistan, through Pakistan to the ocean with an Argentine oil company named Bridas Corporation and its parent Bridas S.A.P.I.C. On September 9, 2003, Bridas prevailed at the Fifth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals on a $500 million interference of contract lawsuit. That lawsuit was then taken to the U.S. Supreme Court and on March 22, 2004 the high court refused to hear the case or consider reversing the Fifth Circuit decision. See US Supreme Court, case 03-1018, State Concern Turkmenneft v. Bridas S.A.P.I.C.,

http://conlaw.usatoday.findlaw.com/supreme_court/orders/2003/032204pzor.html

The Bush Administration does not want any American knowing the truth about what happened in Afghanistan or that we breached a commercial contract with military force to take over a deal that was denied to US oil companies, because there was already a deal in place. Under the Clinton Administration they upended the Pakistan government to cut off that part of the Bridas Corporation deal. Under the Clinton Administration, they compelled Turkmenistan to breach its agreements with Bridas, hence the judgment award of $500 million for interference of contract.

The only remaining obstacle on 9-11 was the remaining agreement between the Taliban and Bridas Corporation.

<snip>

Both the Bush and Clinton Administrations do not want Americans to know that Bridas was interfered with in Turkmenistan and Pakistan to isolate both the Taliban and Bridas Corporation regarding the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline, a pipeline that we now control through use of military force in Afghanistan and raises serious questions about our true motives in attacking Afghanistan following 9-11.

http://www.rense.com/general68/takeback.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. got to protect unocal karzai.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Haven't got all the oil out yet.
Have we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Other
Because the can't finsish the job on TERRA when the troops needed in Afghanistan are in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. You left out THE reason!
IRAN is between Iraq and Afghanistan.
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. To retain the illusion there is a hunt ongoing for Osama bin Who
the bush admin can refer to when asked, rarely, about the promise to get him 'Dead or Alive'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. We love bringing Democracy to other nations.
Gotcha!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. I couldn't choose. Our military bases were all built along the pipeline
right-of-way we went to war for, but it's probably just coincidence that we have access to Iran's eastern border for the coming war. The heroin....just business as usual. Supplies are back to normal and then some. How else could we finance PNACs excellent adventures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC