|
in for whatever period of time they deem necessary if they need you.
The military would never, to my knowledge, do something like say, "we're going to stop loss you for the next 30 years (rest of your life)." They would have the power to do that, but they'd typically do it a year at a time. e.g. you've done your tour in Iraq and your obligation is up... so sorry, not enough Republican voters signed up, so we're going to keep you in for another 1-2 years...
At the end of THAT 1-2 years: So sorry, not enough Republican volunteers in our "all volunteer" military. Guess we'll have to "volunteer" you again. Etc. etc.
It is being widely used and abused by shrubco for obvious reasons, they want to be able to fuel their Middle East war machine, but they don't want the political cost of actually drafting some of those flag waving, ribbon sticker on their SUV shrub voters.
It's always been a feature of military service but was used much more selectively in the past. It happened to a friend of mine just before the shrub administration. His medical specialty was an important one for the military and he was "stop lossed" for a year at the end of his service obligation so that the service would have enough of his type of surgeon. Luckily for him, his dream job at a top university was held for him during that year and he was able to go. If he were still in the service now, I'd bet they'd be stringing him along with stop loss after stop loss, since his specialty is important for reconstructive work with all the soldiers and Marines with mangled limbs.
|