|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
laureloak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 10:22 PM Original message |
Bridge to Nowhere. Please explain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catch22Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because Sen. Stevens threw a tantrum on the Senate floor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 10:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. You got that right! If he had something in his hand he would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clmbohdem (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 10:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I agree, I saw the video and the guy looked nuts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 11:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I think everyone was worried he might go 'postal' so they placated him n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 10:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. That's all I heard but there's got to be more. Right? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catch22Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 10:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Not really. I'm being dead serious, it was a tantrum like no other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peekaloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 11:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. "They would have to remove him on a stretcher first." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. Because they didn't want *their* pork projects taken away, either? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 10:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. But how did the Democrats vote? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 10:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Here's the Roll Call... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-07-05 07:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Out of the 15 that voted to rescind, only 4 were Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-06-05 10:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. I believe this is the truth of the matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC