Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: FBI never interviewed Martino, says CIA source

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:10 AM
Original message
Newsweek: FBI never interviewed Martino, says CIA source
My head is spinning!

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9938998/site/newsweek/
<snip>
Intel Probe: The Yellowcake Mystery

Nov. 14, 2005 issue - The FBI ended a two-and-a-half-year probe into the Niger uranium documents without resolving a key mystery: who forged papers used to bolster President Bush's case for war in Iraq? The bureau announced that the documents, purportedly showing attempts by Saddam Hussein's government to purchase yellowcake uranium, were concocted for financial gain rather than to influence U.S. foreign policy. But Sen. Jay Rockefeller, vice chair of the Senate intelligence committee, had questions. Without more info about the "thoroughness" of the bureau's efforts, he said, "I cannot make a judgment on the accuracy of the conclusions."

The forged documents are a backdrop to the CIA leak case involving the wife of ex-diplomat Joe Wilson. The CIA sent Wilson in February 2002 to look into the Niger uranium issue after Italy's military-intelligence agency, SISMI, got copies of the forged papers and sent reports about them to the CIA and other Western intel agencies. But a senior bureau official, requesting anonymity because of the matter's sensitivity, told NEWSWEEK the FBI never interviewed Rocco Martino, the Italian businessman who provided the documents to SISMI. Because there was no apparent violation of U.S. law, the bureau couldn't compel him to talk—even though he twice visited the United States last year to be interviewed by CBS's "60 Minutes." (The story never aired.) Last week Martino talked again, telling an Italian newspaper he played "a double, triple game"—working as a freelance agent for SISMI and French intelligence. Martino said he was instructed by a SISMI agent to pick up the docs from a woman at the Niger Embassy in Rome. "I was simply the deliveryman," he said, adding he had no idea the papers were fraudulent. Italian intel chief Gen. Nicola Pollari denied that his agency forged the documents, but claimed SISMI warned the United States the documents were fraudulent after Bush mentioned Saddam's interest in buying uranium from Africa in his January 2003 State of the Union Message.

Democratic frustrations about the Iraq war boiled over last week when Minority Leader Sen. Harry Reid forced the Senate into a rare closed session to demand progress on a stalled Senate intel-panel probe. Intel chair Sen. Pat Roberts then agreed to complete the investigation. The panel has assembled nearly 500 prewar public statements by officials of both parties about Saddam's weapons programs and terror links. Committee staffers have matched the pronouncements—which include statements by Dems and Clintonites as well as Bush spokesmen and Capitol Hill GOPers—with prewar intel reports. But Roberts says only senators—not staffers—should draft final conclusions about whether the public statements were hyped, a procedure that infuriates Dems. Critics say Roberts has also stymied an inquiry into whether Pentagon units "cherry-picked" intel reports on Saddam. Roberts turned that probe over to the Pentagon's inspector general; a spokesman for the Pentagon IG declined to comment.

—Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Intel Probe: The Yellowcake Mystery
Bush, FBI, anybody-- Where is the "Probe"? Geez!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It could also be read as referring to the ongoing probe OF the intel!!!
Too bad that's needed, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wish Bush would've cited "Rocco Martino"
Could you imagine that?

"My fellowmericans... uh, its obvious... becomes obviouser, that war - is OBVIOUSLY... is unavoidable... due to intelligence recieved from Rocco Martino..."

the entire country would've broken out of their warmonger spell and died laughing just at the name "Rocco Martino"

would you buy a car from a Rocco Martino, much less a reason to go to war?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Martino could be compelled to testify before Congress,
couldn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't see why not & it surely doesn't appear he would need "compelling"
since he has been blabbing his mouth to various journalists for quite some time now. It will be interesting to see what happens on this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC