|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 07:10 PM Original message |
Why are the Republicans so eager to investigate the new CIA leak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joefree1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Lame attempt to change the focus while punishing the leaker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmylips (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. They want to blame cheney.....heee. heee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. The only reason I can think of is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. it's standard kill the messenger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Postman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
5. To give potential crooks immunity to testify in front of a committee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice Is Comin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. It's better to pull some of the dynamite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fairlyunbalanced (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. Because it gives them an opportunity to take the lesser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharkytack (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
8. Why would they do this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
9. That was only until Trent Lott let it be known that it wasmost likely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jose Diablo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
10. They will offer immunity for testimony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peekaloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
11. The Jerry Lundegaard defense: We're cooperatin' here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. I think it's a case of pointing the finger a little to soon, or shooting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DanCa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-08-05 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
13. An election year is comming up. There trying to r egain credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC