|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
RethugAssKicker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:24 AM Original message |
White Phosophorous... Wheres the outrage!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GrpCaptMandrake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. Hey! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 06:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
76. Al Gore... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. To most in Congress and the MSM and to rabid supporters, it's a.o.k. what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
3. Randi Rhodes.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalVoice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I've been embarassed for awhile now. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:34 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Randi had WP confused with MK77. Other than that, it's an outrage. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
32. randi and mike malloy were going nuts on this last fall!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RethugAssKicker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Oh Shit... I didn't realize that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:33 PM Response to Reply #32 |
47. How about the reports of use of napalm at the beginning of the war?. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AValdoux (738 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
5. Its so frustrating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Southsideirish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
6. Many Americans just don't give a sh*t about what happens to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. when you dehumanize your "enemy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
30. Especially all the terrorists disguised as children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
34. you have that right...most americans don't think of iraqis as people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
8. GodFUCKINGdamn--another moves from the Vietnam playbook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
35. the difference between nam napalm and this phosporus is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:05 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. and you don't survive it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:23 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. exactly!!..but you can not ingest wet mud to help your organs!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
9. He should be tried along with S.H. Same crimes. If M$M doesn't cover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
39. why would they cover it now..?? this was in all papers and tv all over the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 07:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
79. Damn! The Italian Journalists? There were two, right? Who was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LonelyLRLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
11. Probably 90% of Americans don't know about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
48. Bingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
12. Get your shit together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UncleSepp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:42 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Agreed - Ugly against personnel but definitely not WMD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RethugAssKicker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 01:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. It eats away at flesh.. down to the bone and leaves clothes intact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 01:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Leaves clothes intact??? Wow! How does it do that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RethugAssKicker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:11 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Watch the video on it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #24 |
69. Willy Peter burns everything it touches. It's been used by EVERY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:13 PM Response to Reply #22 |
59. warning (graphic) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-05 10:28 AM Response to Reply #59 |
84. I am not sure this is done by WP. Could be, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
38. Then what kind of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:44 PM Response to Reply #38 |
65. ITS AIRPLANE FUEL!!!!!!!!!!!! N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 08:14 PM Response to Reply #65 |
82. You could not be any more wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
43. it eats flesh..it destroyes lungs and all organs when inhaled... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 08:12 PM Response to Reply #43 |
81. Of course it'll destroy lungs and organs when inhaled, FIRE has a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
13. WP is a tricky issue. The military uses it for marking targets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
44. we dumped it on village houses of civilians in the middle of the night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-10-05 10:22 AM Response to Reply #44 |
83. I know. I saw the Italian video. Beyond criminal. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kcass1954 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
15. I watched the video late last night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
16. Did I Miss the story on FOX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
17. Ya are we the media now? |
Add to my Journal | Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
18. What Are You Talking About? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
19. WMD?? Hardly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RethugAssKicker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 01:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Not im my opinon!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
61. Actually, there's a generally-accepted definition of what WMD are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wind Dancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
23. Amy Goodman discusses new documentary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RethugAssKicker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:18 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Thank you for this info: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
25. Try calling it napalm. That should help. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. IT IS NOT NAPALM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Or use the words "napalm substitute" or "napalm equivalent." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:37 PM Response to Reply #28 |
49. How about "the new napalm"? It's an attention-getter n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. It's a chemical weapon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
29. IT WAS PROVED WITHOUT REASONABLE DOUBT.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RethugAssKicker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. I'm with you bro! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:15 PM Response to Reply #29 |
45. The ultimate irony here is that the monster we have unleashed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
31. Have you all seen this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
41. Right Here!!! Chalabi is talking to the American Enterprise Institute ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:51 PM Response to Reply #41 |
52. Meanwhile MSM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:04 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Also, why Miers was his first choice, because BushCo is in trouble. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chat_noir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
42. MSNBC : Italian report: U.S. forces burned Iraqi civilians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedOnce (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
50. God Damn them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
51. C'MON PEOPLE, ITS NOT A CHEMICAL WEAPON!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:56 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. THE EVIDENCE SAYS IT WASN'T USED TO MARK LOCATIONS.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:06 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Randi's caller confirmed that it was Weaponized,AND he knew the difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:25 PM Response to Reply #53 |
62. It doesn't "become a chemical weapon" when it's used against personnel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyberpj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:06 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. It is if you fire it on PEOPLE. See facts here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northamericancitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:09 PM Response to Reply #51 |
58. Call it whatever you want. It melts human being !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:30 PM Response to Reply #51 |
63. Yes its an ugly weapon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #51 |
74. US Army Admits Use of White Phosphorus as Weapon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 05:58 PM Response to Reply #51 |
75. well let them dump it on your house in the middle of the night and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyberpj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
54. I'm with you. - Posted this Boston.com article - only one I saw today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dutchdemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
60. I have the broadcast video up in Flash Format and WMV download |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:56 PM Response to Reply #60 |
68. I REMEMBER POSTING AND SENDING OUT THIS ARTICLE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
64. AND - Depleted Uranium!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
callady (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
66. More War Crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 04:50 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. "We" have bombed a bunch of Nations! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
callady (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 05:40 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. I don't get the puzzlement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. "We" is what we are told. Quotation marks indicate both quote and special |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 06:09 PM Response to Reply #70 |
77. i read the constitution, and sorry but it is "we"..because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
callady (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 07:12 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. Who wrote the constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
71. Dresden is "old news". We have to move on and do hard work (tm). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 06:11 PM Response to Reply #71 |
78. yes ..simple answer..yes ..........n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-09-05 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
72. Right here - I'm outraged... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC