Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Sputniked' again! China plans moon landing for 2017

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:26 PM
Original message
'Sputniked' again! China plans moon landing for 2017
China's space program has been getting the page-16 treatment from the U.S. press, even after they've put people into space. But, do Google news searches on "China" AND "moon" and you're going to get a lot of hits, like this article:

China eyes 2017 moon landing

BEIJING, China (Reuters) -- China, which launched its first manned space mission just two years ago, plans to put a man on the moon around 2017 and investigate what may be the perfect source of fuel, a newspaper reported on Friday.


Two Chinese astronauts orbited Earth for five days last month in the Shenzhou VI and China was now developing new craft up to the Shenzhou X, eyeing a permanent space station and an eventual moon mission, state media said this week.


That reference to "the perfect source of fuel" refers to helium-3. Read on, gentle readers:

The project also includes setting up a moon-based astronomical telescope, measuring the thickness of the moon's soil and the amount of helium-3 on the moon -- an element some researchers say is a perfect, non-polluting fuel source.


Some scientists believe there is enough helium-3 on the moon to power the world for thousands of years.


Kids, the "Republican War on Science" couldn't come at a worse time for our nation. When we saw ourselves as being in a race with the Soviets, we started paying attention to the state of our space program, American science in general, and especially, science education. Now, the Bush mal-administration is cutting non-military scientific research across the board, and the "Intelligent Design" movement is out to destroy real science in American schools, right up to the college level.

The ID people are finally letting their real agenda slip out: Introducing a "new scientific paradigm," basically faith-based science, to replace science's traditional reliance on naturalistic explanations and a scientific method based on observation and experiment.

While I'm at it, I may as well add that I'm not highly impressed by **'s "Moon-Mars Initiative." I don't think it's going to get off the ground - literally and figuratively.

There are so many issues involved here: consider the possiblity of China (along with Russian and India) controlling the major fuel source of the 21st Century. There's another possible energy source from space, the solar power satellite (do Google searches on "solar power satellite" and "space solar power"); a couple of years ago, I saw an op-ed piece suggesting that, it would be the "3rd world" that would develop this, led by China.

Space isn't the only area where China is seeking dominance. I Googled up this link from the India Daily website: India and China work towards dominance in Nanotechnology – it is the next outsourcing wave I've been hearing about China's interest in Nanotechnology for some time now; they're already major actors in the field. Here's a comment from the CRNano blog:

The United States, China, and Germany are the top owners of health-related nanotechnology patents filed internationally between 1975 and 2004, holding 33%, 20% and 13% of the total, respectively.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. NOMIN-FRICKIN-ATED!
You see, Christofascists, this is why we don't give you any slack. We have our children's future and our nation's legacy to think of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. US is to busy protecting itself from "terror" to do anything anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. talk is cheap
i'll believe it when i see it

anyone can say they are going to do anything 12 yrs from now, it's a no-lose situation, if they don't do it, no one remembers the boast

still waiting for my jet pack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Start taking this seriously!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sorry to keep kicking my own thread
...but this is important, and I hit the "post" button before I added the important quotes.

For the China's Taikonauts Fulfil Tsien's Vision link:

Within the next 10 to 15 years, China is determined to become the dominant space power and build first its own massive, permanent, orbiting space station as a stepping stone into the Solar System and then even build and man a long-term base on the Moon.


Can they do it? Yes.


The first thing to recognize about the Chinese vision is that it is serious and backed by a profound political commitment. Former President Jiang Zemin was the first Chinese leader determined to make his nation a major space power, and eventually the dominant one. And his successor, current President Hu Jintao, shares that commitment. But the program they have backed had been created decades earlier by a U.S.-educated genius called Tsien Hsue-Shen.


For the Ambitious Chinese Program Could Trigger Asian Space Race link:

Both India and Japan have shown space capabilities to match China, but what makes Beijing the leader is political will.


"What China has that other countries don't is political will, because it's a top-down directed program," according to Joan Johnson-Freese, an expert on China's space program at the US Naval War College.


"If the Indian government or the Japanese government were to decide that this was a priority for them, I have no doubt that they could in fact excel."


It is no coincidence that the main focus of any future space race seems to be in Asia, since here space exploration is carried out with the same ambition and vigor that characterized the west in the 1960s.


This needs to be an issue, akin to the Sputnik issue of the '50s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Most of China's top leaders are engineers.
I believe this is unprecedented in world history, and for the rest of the world, it is a real threat. Our leaders are competing against analytical skills beyond even their vaguest understanding. And our leaders are completely unarmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teamster633 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. You think the Soviets would have forgotten JFK's speech...
...if we failed to reach the moon in 1969? I tend to think otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. 2017 huh? So around 2023 or 2024
Edited on Wed Nov-09-05 03:07 PM by kenny blankenship
the Chinese will invent disco and give up the joys of engineering for sideburns, astrology and cocaine snorting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack from Charlotte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. LOL! *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Are they selling any one-way tickets?
I know a Regime that will soon be looking for a place to live where people don't hate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wonder if they'll find a US flag and our old dune buggy. Or will
they be the FIRST to arrive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lowell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. If there was any oil there
we'd have already returned and built a pipeline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. this will truly be the "chinese century"...
thanks to the "american sellout gop".

first, they ship our technology, then our jobs, and now our defense to china -- to save a buck while losing our national security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkmaestro019 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. I only thought I hated *
until he opened his pie-hole about FINALLY FREAKIN getting the Space Program to move forward. Great, you moron. The only thing you've ever said that I agree with and you did it to cover your own ass--AND thanks to that having come out of YOUR MOUTH nobody's going to want to touch it for the next five-ten years at least. Thanks loads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Same here.
NASA was in desperate need of retooling anyway, but now that Bush has got his slime all over it, any conversation about getting back to the moon and actually finishing what Apollo started always gets mixed in with Bush hatred. People have a hard time evaluating it on its merits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack from Charlotte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hey. Let's do another moon race. I'll be in Cocoa Beach in a few weeks....
I know where at least one of the German rocketeers used to live. I'll go see if I can find the plans for the Saturn 5 Rocket in his attic. We can wheel out Neil Armstrong.... to screw up the 1st words said on the moon AGAIN and...... It'll be just like old times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Wealth of America
America's post-war economic prosperity came from technological skill, especially in electronics, computers, aerospace, and Internet.

But what's next? The Bush administration supervised the outsourcing of our technical jobs, blocked stem cell research, gave no support to anything but the least promising lines of energy research, and pushed towards defunding Hubble to pay for a ridiculuous Man on Mars mission.

Plus suppressing science in the name of politics and pushing Creationism into the schools.

Grim.

But it was interesting how I responded strongly to your "Sputnikked" headline. I remember Sputnik, and there was a national sense of determination in my generation of 12-16 years olds. Maybe we can get that kind of energization into a post-Bush repair-America strategy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Thanks, Bob!
You've hit on the real issue: linking our (fading) leadership in science and technology to our (rapidly waning) prosperity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. "energization" - Boy I hope so.
For the last decade, I've been thinking we we've been plodding down the road to ruin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. They can certainly do it in this time frame
Right now they are essentially in the "Mercury" stage of this space program. We went from Mercury to a moon landing in less than 10 years.

And we had to solve EVERYTHING in that time, including figuring out the best way amongst hundreds of suggestions on the best methods

This gives China 12 years and everything been solved once. The path while not well beaten has already been laid. China "simply" has to build the the equipment, train the men and follow our very well documented path.

Im glad China is doing it. Maybe we'll get back off our asses and back into space again (instead of low earth orbit where we have been for 30 years)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. we've got some ugly-ass chickens coming home to roost
K&N
this is more important than many people realize
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Let's see who can militarize the moon first?
There were some early Americans plans for this, fortunately there were cooler heads during the cold war on both sides. America was too involved in Vietnam and the Russian heavy lift rockets kept blowing up.

China, that does not have a war of agression to worry about, could size the high ground and win by default. America may own the night, the seas, the air, and Earth orbit. Owning the moon high ground trumps all of that. Gee whiz wouldn't a new cold war be fun especiallly with the Communist country that effectively owns your debt? Thank you Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC