Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Trial upheld for Andrea Yates by Texas highest Criminal court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:39 PM
Original message
New Trial upheld for Andrea Yates by Texas highest Criminal court
The Court of Criminal Appeals (the highest Texas court on criminal issues) today upheld the Court of Appeals decision overturning the original verdict against Andrea Yates and ordering a new trial. http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/topstory2/3449401

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals today upheld a lower court's ruling granting a new trial to Andrea Yates, the Clear Lake-area woman convicted of drowning her children in 2001.

The Austin-based appellate court refused to hear the state's petition for discretionary review after the 1st Texas Court of Appeals ruled in January that testimony from the state's expert witness, -- about a TV episode that never existed -- may have affected the jury's judgment.....

A three-judge 1st Court of Appeals panel based in Houston ruled that Yates' trial was unfair because of testimony from California psychiatrist Park Dietz, the prosecution's sole mental-health expert.

Dietz, who told jurors he had been a consultant on the TV program Law & Order, said one episode portrayed a woman who drowned her children and was found innocent by reason of insanity. He said the episode aired shortly before Yates drowned her children. Prosecutors told jurors that Yates watched the program regularly


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fox News say YAY something besides ARUBA! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatBoreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hope they put Rusty on trial too....
...there isn't a region cold or hot enough in Hell for that bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Rusty should be rotting in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't she the one with the creepy
fundagelical husband? I don't have much sympathy for her but that asswipe was responsible for her mental condition right up to his prissy little eyeballs. He should receive at least the same sentence as she does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You don't have sympathy....
for a woman sufferering from post-natal pychosis??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. She is deeply disturbed
that much is obvious. As a wife and mother, her emotional and physical needs were completely disregarded by her husband. That should count for something. These religiofascists that think women should be brood mares don't understand the complexity of mental illness and instead of dealing with these issues they label moms like her as "weak". The whole thing makes me sick and sad.

The fact that Rusty divorced her and found another broodmare immediately speaks volumes as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. I AM Very Glad. She Is As "Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity" As They
Edited on Wed Nov-09-05 02:15 PM by DistressedAmerican
come. The criminal conviction was an injustice. She should never walk the streets again. But, putting her into the general prison population is not the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. I am so happy about this. A woman who was suffering from psychotic
post-partum depression never should have been put on trial for murder as if she was in a rational state of mind at the time she killed her children.

I had severe post-partum depression when my oldest son was born and it lasted for months. Mine was more of a neurosis and thank goodness I never acted on some of my horrible thoughts. As my hormones leveled off, all was ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC