Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Until it is proven that ** is not guilty of crimes against this nation....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:48 PM
Original message
Until it is proven that ** is not guilty of crimes against this nation....
He should not be allowed to advance any agenda, especially nominating Supreme Court justices.

What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well..I was thinking along the Term...
"Not an embarrassment to the Human Race"...But I'll go along with you..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skelington Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think I like your thinking...but,
I have to go with "innocent until proven guilty", not "guilty untill proven innocent". Even if it is **.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who's going
to nominate them, then?

** isn't even legally accused of any crimes. Not that I disagree with the sentiment you expressed, I don't. But I don't see how this position has any legal weight to it.

Remember, in our system, the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty. And, as I say, there are no pending legal charges against Bush. And even if there were, until he was removed from office (i.e., impeached), he legally has all the powers of the Presidency.

So, who gets to nominate the SC justices??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-09-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. The only places I can think of that use "guilty until proven innocent"
are Guantanamo and The US Military. When I was in the Navy, we all had a saying that if you are accused of a crime in the Navy, you were "guilty until proven innocent."

As much as I like your idea, I don't think it will fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC