Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SSCI Phase I Report - What you NEED TO KNOW

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Terre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 01:08 PM
Original message
SSCI Phase I Report - What you NEED TO KNOW
This information may have been posted before, and if it has I'll bet it's been awhile. This will serve as a good reminder (and rebuttals as necessary) going forward into Phase II of the investigation.

From the SSCI Phase I report, Chapter 10: White Paper Conclusions:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/congress/2004_rpt/iraq-wmd-intell_chapter10-c.htm

(U) Conclusion 85. The Intelligence Community's elimination of the caveats from the unclassified White Paper misrepresented their judgments to the public which did not have access to the classified National Intelligence Estimate containing the more carefully worded assessments.

PARAGRAPH DELETED

Conclusion 86. The names of agencies which had dissenting opinions in the classified National Intelligence Estimate were not included in the unclassified white paper and in the case of the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), the dissenting opinion was excluded completely. In both cases in which there were dissenting opinions, the dissenting agencies were widely regarded as the primary subject matter experts on the issues in question. Excluding the names of the agencies provided readers with an incomplete picture of the nature and extent of the debate within the Intelligence Community regarding these issues.

PARAGRAPH DELETED

PARAGRAPH DELETED

PARAGRAPH DELETED

PARAGRAPH DELETED

(U) Conclusion 87. The key judgment in the unclassified October 2002 White Paper on Iraq's potential to deliver biological agents conveyed a level of threat to the United States homeland inconsistent with the classified National Intelligence Estimate.

PARAGRAPH DELETED

PARAGRAPH DELETED

PARAGRAPH DELETED


Your guess is as good as mine as to what has been redacted from the public version of the report.

HTML Website version of complete report here:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/congress/2004_rpt/iraq-wmd-intell_toc.htm

Bookmark this for your future reference, and to use it for rebuttals against the wingnuts. We're gonna need it for an incredibly bumpy road ahead.

BTW - Today is the day that the "Gang of 6" will be reporting on the status of the Phase II investigation, so you might want to tune into CSpan every now and then to hear if anything is announced, or keep your eye peeled for news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. kicking for the truth
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You can say that again
Amazing how quickly posts drop in the GD forum.

Even if DU'ers don't feel like making a comment, could I get a kick every now and then, just to keep it up top for awhile?

THANKS!  :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holboz Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick kick kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kicking again
Hope this doesn't irritate too much.  If so, let me know and I'll lay off.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. so what did the gang have to say?
Were any announcements made of any kind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC