WTF! FOX David Allen interview re Diebold, paper trail, Georgia means...

only one thing to me: This mother of all scandals is gonna' blow big-time. Murdoch is not happy with Shrub. Why else present this?

I did not see it. But I am reading all about it on my favorite News Source - DU.

Of all people, FOX?

Can 60 Minutes be far behind?

Go get those muthas...

is gonna hang

...and it can always grow more.

It's much more than Diebold.

Diebold was simply the first to leak.

Then again, there is no paper trail to prove such a claim. You'll just have to take my 'certified' word for it!

:evilgrin:
dbt

apparently actually let him speak too. Makes ya wonder.

Money." I wouldn't trust Faux to do anything that doesn't please Roger Ailes or Murdoch.

I caught some of the interview and found it very un-FAUX-like .

Gibson let David speak and didn't try to marginalize or discredit him. I wonder if Gibson will be called on the capret for the interview. It certainly wasn't Faux's normal modis operandi.........

to bite into the conspiracy hook that was offered to me. Having spent nine months proving to people that Bev's work has no tin-foil, I wasn't about to blow it then by accepting the bate.

Perhaps the guy seriously believes the machines are a threat.

Who knows? It was a blow for the truth regardless.

David Allen
www.plan9.org

Diebold Voting Machines
We vote for you, so you don't have to!

The typical Fox viewer now has reason to suspect BBV.

You did a great job, David.

posted a thread about Hannity & Coulter being slammed by a liberal on Hannity & colmes. Could be a ratings ploy, pull in some liberal viewers by throwing out some stories for liberals.

That hasn't changed

Granted, I am watching this with a cautious eye.

But when the economy tanks, and stays tanked, advertisors get scarce.

Even if you are a conservative stalwart, there is only so much time that can go by before your bottom line begins to look like a puddle instead of a pool.

Murdoch has bought a lot of stuff recently. There may be an end to his ability to keep all of it afloat.

And I noted a headline on AOL yesterday that said Bush was blaming the Iraq "misinformation" on the media. And after all the media did for him in parroting his administrations every word and every wish, acting like a good litte propaganda arm of the government.

Is Bush running out of organizations to blame?

What I don't get, is why the media doesn't take him down on a number of other fronts, like WMD, Wilson, etc.

Or don't they want to play the Watergate role this time?

As Bev said on another thread, be very careful with this one. It could be the media has been instructed to go fishing and create a "herring." We don't have to be a herring.

These fascists do it on many levels.

Thanks for reminding us.