Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Security Watch: Congress loves identity thieves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bufffbison Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 10:33 PM
Original message
Security Watch: Congress loves identity thieves
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3513_7-6381707-1.html?tag=nl.e497


<snip from cnet email>
Dear CNET members,
Let me start by asking you this: If your personal data, for example, was breached because a company accidentally lost it, wouldn't you want to be notified of it regardless of whether your information was at risk of identity theft? Well, be very wary, folks, because you may not be notified at all in the future. According to a press release on a new U.S. House bill (HR 4127 DATA) currently in review, "The House DATA bill would require companies to contact customers only when there is a reasonable basis to conclude that there is a significant risk of identity theft." I don't know about you, but I'd like to be notified, period. Let me--and not the company!--determine what is deemed a significant risk for identity theft. If this new proposed bill has rattled some of your nerves, read the latest Security Watch article: "Congress loves identity thieves" by Senior Editor Rob Vamosi for the entire scoop on this new bill. And when you're done, tell us what you think of it. Should you be notified whenever your personal data is stolen from a data warehouse? Speak up and let everyone know what's on your mind. (While I know many of you readers live outside of the United States, and this proposed bill doesn't apply to you, share with us what your country's laws state about personal information being exposed--do you get notifications?)

Cheers!
Lee Koo
Manager, CNET community


Earlier this year, I wrote about several major data breaches at ChoicePoint, then LexisNexis. Headlines screamed how thousands--and in the case of CardSystems, millions--of individuals had their names, social security numbers, and other personal information exposed to god-knows-who. These revelations came only because of a California law, SB 1386, which requires companies to inform California residents if any data breaches occur. The Senate is currently considering a national version of the California law, but a weaker House of Representatives bill is rapidly gaining influence in Congress. If the House bill passes and becomes law first, future data breach revelations will be silenced, and data thieves will be free to run amok.

California SB 1386 is the gold standard
Passed in 2003, California law SB 1386 states that any organization conducting business with California residents must notify those individuals if files containing their names, addresses, and other personal information have been breached. Chances are very few of the customers contained within the breached data files have ever suffered actual identity thefts. The numbers, in the millions, are rough estimates of potential victims, not reported ID thefts. But they're an important insight into the unregulated data warehouse industry, where your purchases at Wal-Mart, combined with your driving history and online newsgroup postings, could someday determine whether you get a job or get that promotion you've long deserved.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. "... a significant risk for identity theft ..."
Like having the name "Bob Jones" ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC