AS you can see I'm a relative newcomer to DU and so do not have down all the nuances of the culture, so I was wondering if hugh(I know a little of the background of this particular malapropism ) is about to become the new moran of DU? In any event I agree somewhat with the basic thrust that the anthrax investigation was at best a half-hearted lackluster effort calculated to produce absolutely nothing and certainly nothing potentially embarrassing to this pretzeldent and his maladministration. As to its being a deliberate conspiratorial cover up by the fibbies and DOJ I can only say I lend about as much credence to Newsmax as I do to the Star and Weekly World News.
So did brush finally find his WMDs? They were under his desk the whole time.
So glad to hear. But why would Saddam send anthrax to liberals? I thought all liberals were anti-american and were doing the work of Saddam's terrorist. Oh wait, the terrorist were from Saudi and not Iraq, and Bin Laden (still alive and killing) thought Saddam was a godless heathen. So really where was the anthrax from?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
