Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woodward's Crimes Against Journalism --->>>

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 02:14 PM
Original message
Woodward's Crimes Against Journalism --->>>

A good point from the Washington Note:




The President put his credibility on the line regarding this CIA case. The first White House official in 130 years was indicted because of this case -- and Bob Woodward is saying that it is an insignificant matter. And now he has a "smoking gun"?

From the Post:

Woodward, who is preparing a third book on the Bush administration, has called Fitzgerald "a junkyard-dog prosecutor" who turns over every rock looking for evidence. The night before Fitzgerald announced Libby's indictment, Woodward said he did not see evidence of criminal intent or of a major crime behind the leak.

"When the story comes out, I'm quite confident we're going to find out that it started kind of as gossip, as chatter," he told CNN's Larry King.

Woodward also said in interviews this summer and fall that the damage done by Plame's name being revealed in the media was "quite minimal."

"When I think all of the facts come out in this case, it's going to be laughable because the consequences are not that great," he told National Public Radio this summer.


Woodward's celebrity-status has seriously blinded him and affected his judgment about quality journalism and his responsibilities to the public. He should never have been making such comments on television about the Plame case if he was, in fact, involved. He should have RECUSED himself in such discussion.

Now, his revelations must become central to the Plame story -- and they threaten significantly the direction that Fitzgerald takes in the investigation.

Woodward should tell what he knows -- and he should be responsible to what really occurred -- but he must be held ACCOUNTABLE for his irresponsibility in the Plame case.

Tomorrow, the Post -- in an editorial penned by Leonard Downie -- better make clear that Bob Woodward gets no "Judy Miller"-like protection or nod of support from the reporting staff of the paper. He has violated the public trust by both withholding information he had in a key investigation, while playing pundit on Larry King, and now upending things late in the process.

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. If there was any doubt that there was a problem with the media
this should leave no doubt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No doubt whatsoever why the Post is losing readership
Edited on Wed Nov-16-05 02:22 PM by lebkuchen
even without this revelation.

Now that we know that Woodward has been holding out information important to an on-going federal case while misdirecting the public's attention, the Post's credibility is shot to hell.

BTW, what made Woodward tell us this much? Sounds like Fitzgerald was about to OUT Bobbie himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. washington post, NY Times, LA Times
Liberal media my ass

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Woodward WAS doing his job - his longtime job covering up for the BFEE.
That's why he was tapped at Navy Intel to work at the W Post in the first place and given the Watergate story to get crazy Nixon out of the way for the real masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. I need a calculator
to keep track of all the liars, traitors and thieves. Whose country is this anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Woodward's "Job" for the Cabal...
Edited on Wed Nov-16-05 03:02 PM by TahitiNut
... was to create the impression that Plame's identity was common knowledge. His mid-June "senior administration source" was very probably Cheney. In preparation for the Libby/Mill 'leak' and Rove/Novak 'leak,' it was Woodwards' "job" to have confidential chit-chat with everyone and his brother about Plame/CIA at every cocktail and dinner party. Such chit-chat was NEVER for publication - since it wouldn't be "patriotic" or "ethical." It just tilled the soil - making it easier to plant the seeds of "everyone knew it" and grow the hedgerow to protect Libby, Rove, and the WHIG against any IIPA charges and convictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. You mean this JudyBob?




:rofl:

(can't stop posting this pic. craps me up every time)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC