if the media has the info and doesn't report it.....let's start labelling them complicit. we could get some duers to hound them about election fraud some could hound them about 9/11 others on Iraq...etc. etc.
give them info to go on....give them time....we can help them connect the dots......and if we don't see results start calling them complicit in the coverups
1. I use the word complicit at every opportunity. It's exactly what they are.
How anyone at DU can be surprised to learn now that the media has been so complicit for the last decade is what seems odd to me.
The RW media machine has steam rolled this country for so long they were bound to run out of steam - or run into an event that was completely out of their spin control - Katrina.
nor that DU is not aware.............we just get knocked down so many times that people kind of give up.... but what I am saying is that with the exposure of Ganon, Miller and now Bob Woodward, the media might be running for cover straight to our side...to prove that they AREN'T complicit. I think this could be our big opportunity........particularly with subjects like voter fraud and 9/11 coverup
And the other comments I made were for DU in general....trust me on this, some don't believe that media is complicit, that they only do it for ratings. I think the agenda is much more sinister...and fascist.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
