Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Firedoglake has it up that Card is one of the sources for Woodward.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 03:51 PM
Original message
Firedoglake has it up that Card is one of the sources for Woodward.
Edited on Wed Nov-16-05 03:53 PM by bunny planet
http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/
The WaPo is reporting that Andy Card, the WH Chief of Staff and Preznit right-hand man, was one source for information for Bob "Mr. Run Amok" Woodward. Woody is saying they didn't discuss Plame at all.

The Post disclosed this morning that Woodward testified under oath Monday in the CIA leak case. Woodward said today he had gotten permission from one of his sources, White House chief of staff Andrew H. Card Jr., to disclose that he had testified that their June 20, 2003 conversation did not involve Plame, the wife of administration critic Joseph C. Wilson IV. He said he had "pushed" his other administration source, without success, to allow him to discuss that person's identity, but that the source has insisted that the waiver applies only to Woodward's testimony.

Awfully nice of Card to allow Woodward to clear his name off the list of potential Deep Throat II nominees (hat tip to reader Jim S for that name -- good one!)...but who does that leave as a "senior administration official?" (Assuming of course that Woodward's attribution is an accurate one, and not another "former White House staffer" attempt at Administration obfuscation.)

Carol Leonnig, federal court reporter of the WaPo, is on MSNBC right now discussing the Woodward revelation today. She doesn't seem happy. At all.

And she is saying that the Woodward story doesn't change the facts alleged by Fitz in Libby's indictment regarding Libby's alleged false statements. She is saying that it gives Libby's defense counsel a tool for raising the issue of reasonable doubt on sourcing -- but that doesn't change the ultimate question of whether or not Libby gave false statements, false testimony or obstructed the investigation.

Lots of developing information on this story, clearly. We'll get it to you as we know it.

One thing for sure: Fitz is looking at others in the Administration beyond Rove and Libby. And at least one of those other officials is talking. Enough to shake Bob Woodward loose. Wonder what else this person is saying? And about whom? Stay tuned.

posted by ReddHedd @ 12:22 PM

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. was that in this morning's edition?
I'm surprised it hasn't gotten more play. It's like people were more shocked that Bob didn't say anything than they were about Card being one of the sources. Which is bigger news, really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't Woodward interview ** for a book or something?
asgh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Card is mentioned in this WP article:
--snip

Woodward said today he had gotten permission from one of his sources, White House chief of staff Andrew H. Card Jr., to disclose that he had testified that their June 20, 2003 conversation did not involve Plame, the wife of administration critic Joseph C. Wilson IV. He said he had "pushed" his other administration source, without success, to allow him to discuss that person's identity, but that the source has insisted that the waiver applies only to Woodward's testimony.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/16/AR2005111601286.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. If true, the 1st thing that comes to mind is that A. Card is being set up.
Rove is better at politics, so that makes Card expendable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yep, that may be what Rove's lawyer told Fitz to avoid indictment
"Talk to Bob Woodward -- he'll tell you all about Andy Card."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. That wouldn't surprise me at all.
Rove hates Card. Card hates Rove. Rove sees the chance to get rid of Card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. As Arte Johnson on
"Laugh In" would say.."Veerry Interesting" :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Laura Rozen had that too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is there anyone in that White House that wasn't trying to smear
Wilson and out Plame? Anyone? I suppose Dickie poo says "jump boys" and they all ask "how high and upon whom, sir?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC