"Irresponsible to Rewrite the History of How History Was Rewritten"WP

Ignoring the Facts
By Richard Cohen
Thursday, November 17, 2005; Page A31

In one of the most intellectually incoherent major speeches ever delivered by a minor president, George W. Bush blamed "some Democrats and antiwar critics" last week for changing their minds about the war in Iraq and now saying they were deceived. "It is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how that war began," the president said. Yes, sir, but it is even more deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how history was rewritten in the first place.

It is the failure to acknowledge this -- not merely that mistakes were made -- that is so troubling about Bush and others in his administration. Yes, the president is right: Foreign intelligence services also thought Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Yes, he is right that members of Congress drew the same conclusion -- although none of them saw the raw intelligence that the White House did. And he is right, too, that Saddam Hussein had simply ignored more than a dozen U.N. resolutions demanding that he reopen his country to arms inspectors. When it came to U.N. resolutions, Hussein was notoriously hard of hearing.

At the moment, no one can have confidence in the Bush administration. It has shown itself inept in the run-up to the war and the conduct of it since. Almost three years into the war, the world is not safer, the Middle East is less stable, and Americans and others die for a mission that is not what it once was and cannot be what it now is called: a fight for democracy. It would be nice, as well as important, to know how we got into this mess -- nice for us, important for the president. It wasn't that he had the wrong facts. It was that the right ones didn't matter.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/16/AR2005111601881.html

In one of the most intellectually incoherent major speeches ever delivered by a minor president

He was defending Woody.
What happened?
:kick:

"It would be nice, fitting and pretty close to sexually exciting if Bush somehow acknowledged his mistakes and said he had learned from them."

Thanks for posting.

he says:
And he is right, too, that Saddam Hussein had simply ignored more than a dozen U.N. resolutions demanding that he reopen his country to arms inspectors. When it came to U.N. resolutions, Hussein was notoriously hard of hearing

While Saddam was a bad guy, by the time Bush invaded, Saddam had already allowed invasive inpections and was destroying missiles. (Think of that we attacked a country after it had just destroyed it's best weapons at our demand. It's hard to get more real than destroying weapons.)

The Democrats would do better to focus more attention on March 2003 rather than Oct 2002. By March 2003, it was obvious there were not WMD. Congress would not have okayed the war at that point.

Foreign intelligence services also thought Iraq had weapons of mass destruction

As I recall, many (if not all) thought just the opposite, at least those not beholden to BushCo. I hope the writer isn't trying to tell us that Great Britain, ala Tony Blair, thought this; The DSM proves otherwise.