Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help! I've been freeped! (Part II)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:08 PM
Original message
Help! I've been freeped! (Part II)
This morning, I posted what I intended to be a humorous thread about my brother's use of the "The Clenis invented blow jobs." right-wing idiocy. The act of writing about it got me thinking. As I responded to some of the posts, I became more disturbed. Mom called after lunch, and discussing it with her, I became yet more concerned.

"Bill Clinton popularized oral sex, thus perverting our nation's teens." is one of the dumbest, most asinine statements I have ever heard. I've joked about it and laughed at it, simply because it is totally absurd. Mom was aware that it was hokey spin whipped out to obscure the findings that abstinence only sex-ed was a dismal failure. That assured me that I hadn't imagined it. But honestly, I always thought it was a straw-man intended to derail discussion. I never thought anyone believed it!

Let's be honest. The whole idea is worthy only of comedic satire. I could imagine a Saturday Night Live skit with this storyline. But no serious political debate can ensue from such a statement. Let's look at only the obvious problems with this:


  • Today's high school seniors were ten years old in 1998. When I was ten, I knew who was president because of all the brouhaha surrounding Vietnam. I had to pay attention because by then it was obvious that my ass was next. I'd be surprised if half of today's ten year olds knew more about the presidency than the Monkey King's name.
  • Given my own mindset in high school, the last person I would have looked to as a sexual role model was the freakin' President. (In all honesty, it was Nixon, so I am biased.) I can't imagine that today's teens are much different.
  • Human sexuality is so complex that the very idea of claiming a major behavior shift due to a single incident is ludicrous. Parental influence, social norms, peer attitudes were all voided by the mighty Clenis? Please.
  • I'm sure there are other and better reasons, but at the moment, I'm too stunned to think it through completely.


The point is, the arguments I've listed are blatantly obvious. But for some reason, people (as my brother has so painfully proven) buy into this shit. I could laugh about it as long as I was convinced that nobody really believed it, that it was bullshit being thrown around just to confuse the debate. (Think about it. The moment you hear it, your immediate response is: "That's the dumbest thing I ever heard." and your brain locks up. It's the Chewbaka defense of political debate.) But the idea that even one person buys in to this crap horrifies me. Are we so stupid, as a culture, that even undisguised nonsense can pass as reality? If people really, honestly, seriously believe the Clenis perverted a generation, that we'll still find WMD in Iraq, that George W. Bunnypants is a Good Old Boy, then we are well and truly screwed. Within a decade, the Flying Spaghetti monster will no longer be a satirical phenomenon, it will be the guiding motive for hordes of self-appointed evangelists in airport lounges. Barney the purple, talking stuffed toy will be president. If people actually buy into such shit, what hope does the human race have?

"Look at the silly monkey!"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actually the first person
who stated that 'oral sex isn't sex', was Newt Gingrich.

Tell him that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Oh, I missed that, can you fill me in?
I'd like to be able to use that w/my winger relatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Well, he said it in front of a friend of mine.
I will PM you the details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Easily skewered.
Edited on Thu Nov-17-05 05:13 PM by silverweb
Just take a survey of how many baby boomers (who reached the age of consent during the '60s and '70s) had heard of or participated in oral sex at that time. If Clinton really invented/popularized the practice as President, the number would be zero, right?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. gee, I was in high school in the early nineties
and there was plenty of oral sex going on. I guess we were trendsetters, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. When I was 17 I gave my boyfriend a blow job - once - it was 1979. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToolTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Me too, but I think it was 1959.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. I know that as a teacher at that time
I carefully answered a few questions about just why Clinton was in trouble.

I think the concept of oral sex might, therefore, have been introduced a bit earlier to some kids than otherwise. But geez, having oral sex because you learned it existed? Or because some old guy did it? I don't think so.

Also, you can tell kids the entired facts of life when they are five, but they only hear what they want to. It takes a good long while for it all to sink in and it doesn't until the child is developmentally ready to understand what it means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Young man in our local news killed his 18 yr old girlfriend. I blame
the giggling murderer Bush for devaluing human life!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. First off do you really think that your brother believes what he is saying
or do you think that perhaps he is being a lawyer for team red and is arguing for arguments sake against team blue?

If he does really believe in his argument why doesn't he have problems with Bob Dole who had commercials for Viagra (and a pepsi ad with him ogling Britney Spears in a reference to his viagra ad). That to me is more of a promotion for sex (he was actually selling a sexual product).

What you said about people with so much interest in sex as a means and motive for hordes of self-appointed evangelists is the root of the problem. I think that many of these people who like pointing the finger just like the sound of their own voices and the power they feel in condemning other people (they feel God-like).

The only people listening to these sorts of ramblings about Clinton's effect on teenage sexuality are adults. Teenagers are preoccupied with their personal microcosm that they live in.The kids are definitely more tuned into pop culture than politics (I'm sure kids talk much more about Britney Spears and Kevin Federline than George and Laura Bush). And if the government has any part in making teenagers think of sex, they should look to the pharmaceutical companies that let the kids know that they can have erections for hours and hours by taking a pill that makes many allies of the government very rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. LOL
People have been having oral sex for as long as there have been people having sex. Just my guess. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. You know it!
Hell, look back to the sexual history of Ancient Greece and Rome. They did stuff that'd probably make some of us blush in modern times. Oral sex was just the tip of the iceburg. :p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. I must be weird.....
I gave my first blowjob at 18, but I lost my virginity at 16. Where would I fit in in this little scenario? (I was a teen in the early 90s). :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm with you!
(also early 90's teen). I guess I didn't see the point of just being a giver and not a taker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Anyone who isn't on a witch hunt knows oral sex isn't sex...
... especially high school kids.

I can't tell you how many times I had this conversation when I was in high school in 1998:

Me - "Hey man, how'd your date go?"
Friend - "Pretty good, if you know what I mean."
Me - "So'd she put out?"
Friend - "Naw, I just got some head."

I have worked at high schools for the past few years and I have heard that same conversation dozens of times from the kids in the hallways and the weight rooms.

No one really thinks it's sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Everytime they bring up this, I just ask them if 5 years from now
will it be a legitimate to say children torture animals, other children, etc. because "Bush popularized torture."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Good idea!
Hell, why wait five years? For those idiots with the attention span of a gnat, 5 months is long enough.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC