Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Post lies that Bush Sr never criticized Clinton's foreign policy.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:16 PM
Original message
NY Post lies that Bush Sr never criticized Clinton's foreign policy.
A November 17 New York Post editorial attacked former President Bill Clinton's criticism of President Bush's decision to invade Iraq, stating that "it has long been accepted that former presidents do not publicly criticize their successors, particularly when it comes to foreign policy." The editorial then falsely claimed that "the first President Bush held his tongue when it came to judging Clinton's dubious foreign-policy performance."

On October 13, 1993, during a visit at a San Antonio grade school, Bush expressed concern that the humanitarian mission to Somalia that he had launched nearly a year earlier was being "messed up" by the Clinton administration.

In the February 1994 edition of Washingtonian magazine, Bush criticized the Clinton administration's purported lack of a "general strategy" in the foreign policy arena and the "start-and-stop" failures it had exhibited, citing Clinton's handling of the volatile situation in Haiti as a prime example.


From the November 17 New York Post editorial headlined "Bill Clinton's Bad Behavior":

In a speech to students at the American University of Dubai, the former president fired a rhetorical broadside against President Bush, saying the invasion of Iraq was "a big mistake."

Toppling Saddam Hussein may have been "a good thing," said Clinton, "but I don't agree with what was done."

He particularly blasted the decision to "dismantle the whole authority structure of Iraq," suggesting that the U.S. should have left Saddam's "fundamental military and social and police structure intact."

Thanks for nothing, Bill.

It has long been accepted that former presidents do not publicly criticize their successors, particularly when it comes to foreign policy; certainly the first President Bush held his tongue when it came to judging Clinton's dubious foreign-policy performance.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200511180002

Typical neocon bullshit from a Murdoch rag...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NorCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. More RW lies and half-truths?
who would have thought! I guess they won't be taking the highroad on this one :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC