Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else surprised at Rep Murtha's speeches?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:23 AM
Original message
Anyone else surprised at Rep Murtha's speeches?
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 11:26 AM by HardWorkingDem
He was a very compelling speaker yesterday and last night. I have to be honest, I have not seen a series of speeches as good as his in a long time and I was very surprised after seeing his very first speech on the 17th.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Amazed is more like it..

I've never seen a more powerful, obviously historical speech given by a government official in my 41 years. I felt like I was witnessing a speech by FDR or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemunkee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Didn't see his speech.
I had to go to a play at my daughters school. Where can I find the text?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. A transcript would not do it justice. It was like "Mr. Smith goes to
Washington."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I am now waiting to see
which Democrat will give THE speech dealing with the impact of the neocon model on the looting of national assets and the increased impoverishment on the poor and middle class. The speech must incorporate the disasters in NOLA, Florida, etc, the culture of corruption, the votes in the legislature against the poor and middle class and the way forward.

The time is ripe for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. The "War" has changed, it is now "Occupation" Murtha speaks TTP
Truth To Power.

Conservatives already know this truth in their hardened hearts but old Vulcan habits are hard to break. Being of sound mind, Dems like Murtha are just now putting into words what the situation has long ago evolved to. Even some conservatives are now realizing this, as today's Newsday column by James Pinkerton shows

Slaughter of Sunni foes is inevitable
http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/ny-vppin4515723nov17,0,3856377.column?coll=ny-rightrail-columnist

"But while the intensity of hatred in Iraq is oceanic, the killing is a comparative drizzle. Why? Because the U.S. military is preventing an out-and-out civil war. In the words of Edward Luttwak, a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., "Ironically, Americans troops are now interposed between the insurgents and our allies in Iraq, in effect protecting our enemies from our friends."

That is, the U.S. military has chosen to interpose itself between the Sunnis, on the one side, and the Shia and the Kurds on the other. So it's GIs operating in the Sunni Triangle, getting picked off with increasing frequency: November 2005 is shaping up as the fifth-deadliest month for Americans in Iraq in the 33 months of fighting, according to globalsecurity.org. Yes, increasingly well-equipped Shia and Kurds are also involved in those anti-Sunni military operations, but Americans of the Gen. Horst-like ethical persuasion are preventing those anti-Sunni Iraqis from massacring the Sunnis as they come across them.

Yet, in the history of warfare, it's massacring that works. Gary Brecher, who writes the online column "War Nerd," observes, "The only effective counterinsurgency techniques are torture, reprisal and, ultimately, genocide." Some might say that Brecher is overstating the situation - although the Israelis, of course, after 40 years of failing to pacify Muslims in the West Bank and Gaza, would no doubt agree that half-measures don't do the trick.

As the politics of Iraq continue to shift in Washington, it's likely that one day the Americans will quit Iraq, and the Shia and the Kurds will be unleashed on their foes. Slaughter is not the solution Americans were led to expect in 2003, but it's the solution that's coming, finally."

Murta's speech

Murtha in full
http://www.dccc.org/stakeholder/archives/003914.html

shows us that militarily the occupation cannot be won. US forces did win the war back when the 'mission accomplished' USS Lincoln banner was put up. But today, because of failed intelligence and Republican intransigence in facing facts and changed situations in Iraq "the future of our military is at risk", as Murtha says. The Pentagon knows it, the public knows it, and soon the idiots in the White House will know it.

Redeploy US troops in the Middle East; don't mislabel Murtha's call as a 'withdrawal': Murtha's speech explicitly called for redeployment and NOT withdrawal, the cheap stunt you can expect of misleading Republicans in Congress (taking their cue from the mis-Leader-in-Chief.

"I said over a year ago, and now the military and the Administration agrees, Iraq can not be won "militarily." I said two years ago, the key to progress in Iraq is to Iraqitize, Internationalize and Energize. I believe the same today. But I have concluded that the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq is impeding this progress...

My plan calls:

To immediately redeploy U.S. troops consistent with the safety of U.S. forces.

To create a quick reaction force in the region.

To create an over-the-horizon presence of Marines.

To diplomatically pursue security and stability in Iraq.

...Our military has done everything that has been asked of them, the U.S. can not accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. It is time to bring them home."

--from the Murtha speech

Let the Iraqis sort out scores on their own. They'll have themselves to blame, not US forces as a convenient excuse. The rest of the Arab world can then concentrate on creating conditions that will alleviate the humiliation the Arab Human Development Report 2004 says are coming

Lack of reform in Arab states could lead to chaotic social upheaval – UN report
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=13865&Cr=arab&Cr1=development

"Among other points, the report argues institutionalized corruption and pervasive “clannism” reinforce the black hole phenomenon and says Arab countries have failed to meet their own peoples’ aspirations for development, security and liberation."

Without US troops to blame maybe the Arab world will concentrate their efforts constructively, knowing that time and oil revenues for real progress are quickly running out.

US conservatives ! Regain your common sense !








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. He's been holding this back a loooooooong time. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Surprised, stunned, and grateful beyond words. A well-spoken,
passionate statesman with courage, integrity, a deeply-felt love for the troops AND their families; we owe him a debt we can never repay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Surprised only by the impact.
There have been some good speeches by Dems all along. This one got noticed - partly, I think, because Murtha is senior and well respected, but also because the reaction by the Repugs made it news the corporate media would notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. yeah, I'm surprised by the impact as well...
someone on TV (talking head? cspan caller?) said yesterday that you can bet the generals are behind Murtha. Sort of made sense and if that is true, you've got blow back by the military and Bush is in more trouble than we imagined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. lots of things coming to a conjuncture in this moment in history--the msn
is beginning (somewhat)--to see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. When I first saw his speech
I thought now there's someone who sounds like a President.I was extremly moved and impressed by him and knowing his history only made me respect him all the more.
He is a true patriot.A brave and courageous man.We need more like him in our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. The man is speaking his mind.
His a good speaker,he's been in public life for over 30 years. But, I believe a large part of the reason he sounds so eloquent is that he is telling you what he actually believes. He is not dressing up his speech in any politically correct qualifiers or any other bullshit.

I think if some more dems would stop worrying about the possible political effects of what they say and would just say what they think, they'd be a lot more successful at winning elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. He's still in favor of a large Pentagon budget and more weapons systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC