Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pat Lang's insights on the LAT "Curveball Story"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 07:39 PM
Original message
Pat Lang's insights on the LAT "Curveball Story"
Edited on Sun Nov-20-05 07:55 PM by understandinglife
Curveball the Eight Ball

by Patrick Lang


Sun Nov 20th, 2005 at 12:59:10 PM EDT

John Goetz has been working on the Curveball story for a long time now. It is published today in the Los Angeles Times(http://tinyurl.com/ax5d9).

I am proud to say that I did what I could to help him and his partner Bob Drogin with this.

This story is a massive piece of the jigsaw puzzle that only now is beginning to be solved for the benefit of the understanding of the American people as to why they are now at war in Iraq.

The war in Afghanistan is easy to understand. That Kiplingesque, far away, tribal land was made into a haven and breeding ground for enemies determined to harm us. Only the truly pacifist have many doubts about the necessity that caused US intervention there.

Iraq is a different matter. <clip>

Much more at the link:
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2005/11/20/12242/343


Pat Lang posts occassionally at Larry Johnson's noquarter.typepad.com blog.

His bio reads: a highly decorated retired senior officer of U.S. Military Intelligence and U.S. Army Special Forces, served as “Defense Intelligence Officer for the Middle East, South Asia and Terrorism" for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and was later the first Director of the Defense Humint Service. Col. Lang was the first Professor of the Arabic Language at the United States Military Academy at West Point. For his service in the DIA, he was awarded the “Presidential Rank of Distinguished Executive.” He is a frequent commentator on television and radio, including MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann (interview), CNN and Wolf Blitzer's Situation Room (interview), PBS's Newshour, NPR's "All Things Considered," (interview), and more (http://turcopolier.typepad.com).

Thought those of you who haven't seen his post at Booman Tribune would want to read it and perhaps comment.


Peace.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sonofliberty Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I must take issue with your statement
about pacifist being the only ones with doubts about Afghanistan we hit them because to hit Saudi arabia would cause our economy to collapse and they were they least ap to hit back on any major scale they had already been bludgeoned by the no de funked USSR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You should send your comment to Pat Lang, at his blog, given that ...
... the statement is his, not mine.

Welcome to DU.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks for posting this
The LA Times article is fascinating. I am eating up any input about it from other sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I didn't support the war on Afghanistan then or now. My reasons are
Edited on Sun Nov-20-05 09:10 PM by higher class
piling up.

1. If foreigners pulled off 9-11 (which I doubt), the act was a criminal act, but they (our leaders) didn't want to be subject to courts and juries. They wanted war at that minute. They were pumped for war. They had THEIR motives for war. They needed a war to gain other benefits in addition to all the reasons that have come up including Israel, oil, euro-dollar, imperialism. They needed it immediately because they were ready. It was so convenient of those 19 men, some of whom are still alive, to hijack those aircraft when they did on such an ominous numbered day and when they already had terror practice sessions in progress on many levels, and when Cheney was bunkered down, and George was out of the way. (They admitted that they didn't want judges and juries. I believe it came out of Rumsfeld's mouth.)


2. It had to be Afghanistan to give the impression that they were pursuing bin Laden and to get in on the poppy trade. They didn't want to fight in the mountains because that was out of their element and they couldn't test out new toys meant for more flat land. Four wheeled things don't move over the mountains very well and they had a stockpile of old stuff they could use. It only takes legs and horses to get through the mountains and that was too slow to take down some of the faces on their 52 card deck right away for publicity sake. Besides, the bulk of our military are not trained to fight in mountains. (They admitted that they didn't want to fight in Afghanistan because of the mountains. I believe it came out of Rumsfeld's mouth.)

3. They trade with the Taliban. Or at least friends of Cheney trade with the Taliban. They couldn't cause too much war there.

4. Taking Afghanistan as proclaimed in the news by propaganda networks and going to Iraq meant that they could claim two countries for democracy, but with an underlying goal of taking two of the four or five they need to fulfill their commitment to Israel in partnership with the UK and with help from Canada and Australia.

Basically, they called a war when a courtroom was all that was needed. And no adults go off and declare a war without an assessment, but they do if they had it planned from before the famous day.

I knew that responsible people did not go off and declare a war as reactively as they did. Each day following brought us more questions than answers, but they kept planning, then fighting against all odds of approval and with a treasure trove of lies.

No, I never approved of the war. I believe in seeking and desiring peace which means talking. I believe in leaders acting as adults. I believe in children who need adults, not knee-jerkers, keeping peace for them so they can grow up peacefully. It can be done. We don't always have to have war. Too many people desire war.

I don't believe in the non-humility of my fellow countrymen and women and their refusal to look at our phony, hypocritical, delusional, and highly destructive policies. In fact, the hate we are experiencing has been carefully created to keep us at war with great profits for a few. But death, dismemberment, loss of sanity and immune systems is what we get for our neighbor kids and families. In addition to the extremes of the body, they suffer the loss of career dreams and broken families and families living in poverty and never-ending struggles with military government bureaucracy for simple rights. On both sides of the ocean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I have ZERO disagreement with your eloquent statements. ZERO.
Run for office. You have my vote.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Besides the premise is ridiculous
A Islamic Jihadist is uninterested in changing the minds of infidels very much or mostly which rule out 9/11 being a political statement in the true sense even for crazies. A massive hit like what was supposedly done on 9/11 would have to have much help from the inside and outside to be that successful. The history and facts don't support the motive or M.O.for them things to happen like that. Me really thinks all the propaganda to try to make it fact like it is officially explained is really suspect also. They want people to believe or give it up and neither one is happening

9/11 was a creation made in a vacuum looking for power, all the trends point that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I agree. I opposed the invasion of Afghanistan from Day One.
It was the "popular" war crime ... more "popular" than the invasion of Iraq, but a war crime nonetheless. Absolutely every cockamamie rationale for the invasion was pure bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Hear, hear! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Some interesting snippets.
<snip>

The White House, for example, ignored evidence gathered by United Nations weapons inspectors shortly before the war that disproved Curveball's account. Bush and his aides issued increasingly dire warnings about Iraq's biological weapons before the war even though intelligence from Curveball had not changed in two years.

At the Central Intelligence Agency, officials embraced Curveball's account even though they could not confirm it or interview him until a year after the invasion. They ignored multiple warnings about his reliability before the war, punished in-house critics who provided proof that he had lied and refused to admit error until May 2004, 14 months after the invasion.

<snip>

But the CIA and the White House overlooked the holes in the story.

<snip>

U.S. and German officials feared that Ahmad Chalabi had coached Curveball after the defector said his brother had worked as a bodyguard for the controversial Iraqi exile leader. But they found no evidence.

Curveball "had very little contact with his brother," the BND supervisor said. "They are not close.''

More problematic were the three sources the CIA said had corroborated Curveball's story. Two had ties to Chalabi. All three turned out to be frauds.

Powell said he was never warned, during three days of intense briefings at CIA headquarters before his U.N. speech, that he was using material that both the DIA and CIA had determined was false.

<snip>

Tenet has denied receiving warnings that Curveball might be a fabricator. He declined to be interviewed for this report.

<snip>

Curveball was last in his engineering class, not first, as he had claimed. He was a low-level trainee engineer, not a project chief or site manager, as the CIA had insisted.

Most important, records showed Curveball had been fired in 1995, at the very time he said he had begun working on bio-warfare trucks. A former CIA official said Curveball also apparently was jailed for a sex crime and then drove a Baghdad taxi.

<snip>



A clusterfuck in the White House ... beats a blowjob!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. Juvenile. When you look at these people and their Congressional
Representatives and their media court jesters - all I can think of is JUVENILE.

They are juvenile to think we will continue to believe their dozen reasons for going to war.

They were juvenile to think that they could get away with flimsy lies.

Their congressional leaders run the Houses like juveniles and put in juvenile performances. They contrive and manipulate at a juvenile level.

Their juvenile pimps and court jesters on the tv screen are bags of lies and propaganda worse than in the USSR because they make such a big pretense out of their dramatic and hilarious lies delivered with either bright smiles and obvious fakery.

Their born-again voting base are juvenile in attempting to push THEIR RELIGION down the throats of the world and rewrite the constitution for them (pushing their religion down the throats of their world applies to Moslem radicals, also.)

Their infinite think tank representatives lie transparently - an easy indicator.

Rumsfeld was a juvenile for not planning and preparing for ANY contingencies. That is what juveniles do.

Powell was juvenile to agreeing to participate in their world lie.

George is a number one juvenile who requires constant coaching, guidance, and propping up (except he is long past the benefits that normal juveniles gain from being propped up).

We are victims of juveniles and their wars and dictums.

Juvenile, in their case, is all about irresponsibility. And because of who they are - irresponsibility towards humanity.

It's time they are recognized by more people inthis country for who they are. We have not been represented well.

But, when this wave of juveniles resign there are, unfortunately, another wave of them groomed and being groomed to protect the born-again bible, corporate domination, military rule, news blackouts, submissive and controlled citizens, and the protection of Israel to the detriment of other humans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Make this an OP.
I want to recommend it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Pardon my ignorance. What is OP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Original Post - the post that starts it's own thread. I think!
If you start your own thread with your post on how juvenile they are -- I think more people need to see them that way -- then I can recommend it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. OK. I did it. Starts out Juveniles. Some slight changes made. Thanks
for pushing me. It's nice to know someone is in sync with my way of looking at our dilemma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I was out of the office for awhile, sorry it took me so long to respond.
I kicked & recommended it, anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC