Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: The War Debate: A healthy debate or putting U.S. troops in danger?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:33 AM
Original message
MSNBC: The War Debate: A healthy debate or putting U.S. troops in danger?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080261/#survey



The War Debate: A healthy debate or putting U.S. troops in danger? * 1150 responses


Healthy debate 75%
Putting U.S. troops in danger 25%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mattomjoe Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can anyone surmise what kind of distored logic is required to
Edited on Mon Nov-21-05 10:36 AM by mattomjoe
come to arrive at the belief that debating the war puts troops in danger?????? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Healty Debate 77%
Healthy Debate 77%
Putting U.S. troops in danger 23%

1921 responses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. 75 to 25 its a HEALTHY DEBATE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes. The Arabs all understand English and watch MSNBC all day long...
So do not debate anything about the war. Keep your mouths shut. Leave everything to Bush and Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LEW Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. done
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. 76
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. What Sort Of Imbecile Thinks That Talking About Alternatives. . .
. . .endangers troops 8,000 miles away? Anybody who answers this poll "endangers. . . " is dumber than dirt.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. What's hurting the troops is BEING IN IRAQ!
My nephew is SERVING HIS THIRD YEAR OVER THERE and he's in the NG! Get these BOYS BACK HOME NOW! NO MORE DEBATE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. Healthy debate, stupid question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MamaBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. Done.
Bringing the troops home: A healthy debate or putting U.S. troops in danger? * 2101 responses

Healthy debate 76%
Putting U.S. troops in danger 24%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. K and R! Unhealthy Question, but what's new...it's M$M. ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. Here's the thing ...
what's the alternative? If we can't debate the actions our government is taking in our names, then they can just keep their war going and we are forced into silence. When would any debate take place? They could, as they did with Iraq, start the war then cry that anyone who questions them is 'harming the troops". It's really the way they want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. Not having a debate already put them in danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. done 77 23 3229 responses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC