|
Edited on Tue Nov-22-05 12:30 AM by dusmcj
an egalitarian society in which a decent if modest quality of life is available to the masses is not in the interests of the socioeconomic ruling stratum, because a captive population is needed to engage in the productive activity which supplies money (capital flows) into the system where it moves upward to that stratum. So shut up and get back to work, slave !
Old Templar families turning to piracy, later the slave trade, the Bushes and the Fords trading with the Nazi enemy in WWII, or what have you, it's all the same sh!t all the time. The preservation of the (quite pragmatic, tangible socioeconomic) status quo is paramount, and structures ranging from social hierarchies to norms which encourage a male-female child-producing couple with a wage earner controlled by normative forces like the church and a whispering society are all established with the aim to keep the masses under control (hence the popularization of affect-laden phrases like Under Control, Trust, Pay the Price, Connected, Positive, Confident, Reality, Natural Law, Character, etc.) so that they will be willing to produce for the socioeconomic superstructure (now globalized). Add cajoling forces like flatulent advocacy of the universal advantage of the free market (with the concomitant denial of the fact that it fails when engaged to supply needs as opposed to wants), and patronizing messages from the doyennes and gray eminences of good society that, if you only play by the rules, have a positive-enough attitude, and some luck (with misfortune on the other hand either being genuinely random, or manufactured by your peers), that you, or maybe more likely your descendants, may one day be as rich, powerful, and important as they are. This is most blatantly visible in the "Freedom"/"Liberal" parties of western Europe, where the old eminences are frequently in fact members of nobility or old high society, and do their best to enforce adherence to the rule of not disturbing the socioeconomic order and coopt/neutralize those who threaten to disobey (see Mr. Haider's adventures with the doyenne of the Austrian Freedom party (I think, maybe the People's party) - "can he be made a useful idiot and turned to our purposes ?" (just like Hitler was, though he came equipped with plentiful raw material to work with in the form of his psychopathology)), but we have the same problem here, and in fact the suspects are the same - cheerily liberal regarding "opportunity" (what you can beat out of others), and brutally conservative regarding dissent and nonparticipation. Neoliberal, neoconservative, I have to take a dump. (Here in the US this took the form of Bush 1's administration setting a tone that everything was OK, even gays and environmentalism, as long as the socioeconomic power status quo was not questioned - dissent against the system was not tolerated, and if it couldn't be made palatable enough for the usual malcontents, then they were no longer quite so OK, and at the least were lacking in Character, Confidence, and Commitment to use Doober/Dick lingo. Kinder and gentler as long as you don't fuck with my profits. Like father, like son ?)
What we have here is another phase in the attempted demolition of the product of thousands of years of enlightened and emancipated thinking, and hard work (in many cases at the cost of death) by those who pursued the notion that self-interest needs to be enlightened, and accompanied by concern for collective interest, and that above all action needs to be governed by what reality (with a small 'r') is, as opposed to what the self-serving side of our imagination might want it to be. Instead we are fed a poisonous pablum of self-censorship on the one hand, where we are supposed to deny our own good judgement about what works and what doesn't, and vigorous actvity on the other which will allegedly produce "win-win solutions", by which we supposedly get something, and the other guy does too, which may convince him to remove the knife from your throat. Concretely we see the demolition of labor rights, the inability of the nation to establish minimal social programs which work for all the people (e.g. health care), the unconstrained gorging of the hogs at the corporate slop trough, and the replacement of education with consumerism. This is a corruption of capitalism among other things, and would certainly be unrecognizable to the Founders, products of the secular humanist Enlightenment that they were, as anything resembling the America they gave their lives to creating.
It is worth noting that the system the cultural vandals and conservative verminocracy are establishing is blatantly unsustainable, more so than what their predecessors produced, and will fail. However, apocalypse, or even just the demolition of the meager successes the species has had at creating social structures which move beyond the instinct brain and instead provide a minimal framework for successful coexistence, are too high a cost for that end. I prefer to retire the Bush league, the Bush dynasty, and all their lackeys and exploiters, and get on with the planet's business. With any luck, they will "stay the course" and make themselves unelectable for the next 60 years, and thus do the job for us.
|