Sign this petition for Ross Perot to run!

Sephirstein

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 08:31 PM
Original message

Sign this petition for Ross Perot to run!

http://www.runrossrun.com/

Lie about your support for him and kick Repuke ass!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

gemini_liberal

(307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 08:34 PM
Response to Original message

1. errr won't he take votes from us?

one of the things that may give the Democrats the victory in 2004 is the R wingers who hate Bush, putting Perot in is just gonna give him those votes, and may end up making the Democratic candidate come under. Just my thought - I could be wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Julien Sorel

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1

7. I think you're right. Perot appeals to the angry voters,

Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 08:52 PM by BillyBunter

and this time, the angry voters were likely to go with us. If Perot runs, he gives them an option I would rather they didn't have.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

GoneOffShore

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 08:42 PM
Response to Original message

2. Another Repuke

Perot is just a Repuke in populist clothing.
We don't need him to take focus from getting Chimpy & his cronies like Tom 'The Bugman' Delay out of power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

lysergik

(340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 08:47 PM
Response to Original message

3. Thats ok

Didn't like him the first time, won't like him this time. Plus Dana Carvey isn't around to make fun of him this time

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Deja Q

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 08:48 PM
Response to Original message

4. He helped Clinton in 1992...

Clinton won with 43% of the vote. How kewl is that? B-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

gemini_liberal

(307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #4

8. no

if anything, he hindered Clinton

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Clete

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 08:49 PM
Response to Original message

5. No, no. For all the above reasons,

and those guys should pull that poll if they mistakenly thought it would help the Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

laura888

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 08:51 PM
Response to Original message

6. but what about the at great "sucking" sound...

...he warned us about if NAFTA went through. He was right-on about that, wasn't he?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

sweetheart

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 08:59 PM
Response to Original message

9. i couldn't do it

i went to the site with the thought that he will divide the republicans as much as the bull moose party did in 1912 or like he himself did in 1992 or like in the peasant revolt of 1381 or like in 1066 :-) .. oh, perhaps not that far back... ;-)

Just my skin started crawling as i looked in his eyes... and i had to get off that website before i blew chunks. Sure, it was better than shrub by about 2 degrees... but vibe-wise... not much more... i can't even fake supporting that... sorry.

Either we win in a fair fight, or we don't deserve to win. I know it sounds soppy, but c'est la vie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

gemini_liberal

(307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #9

10. thankyou

you beat me to it, I was about to say the same thing, in addition to my other point. The only way the left is gonna be superior is if it stays morally superior. We can't drag ourselves down to freeper level.

Thankyou, sweetheart. It's people like you who remind me that the ledt is the right side to be on :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Blue_Roses

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Oct-16-03 09:39 PM
Response to Original message

11. Ross Perot is a nut

and there is no way I would support him to run for anything even if it did mean splitting the repub vote--which it wouldn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Wed May 01st 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.