Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOCUS: Just Planning War of Aggression IS A War Crime

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 12:53 AM
Original message
FOCUS: Just Planning War of Aggression IS A War Crime
JUST PLANNING:

Article 6 of the Charter of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal established the legal basis for trying individuals accused of the following acts: Crimes against peace: the planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing.

International Committee of the Red Cross
The evolution of individual criminal
responsibility under international law

September 1999
http://billmon.org/archives/002335.html


Did they make it stick?

And so by means of careful preparation in the diplomatic field, among others, the Nazi conspirators had woven a position for themselves, so that they could seriously consider plans for war and begin to outline time tables, not binding time tables and not specific ones in terms of months and days, but still general time tables, in terms of years, which were the necessary foundation for further aggressive planning, and a spur to more specific planning.

And that time table was developed, as the Tribunal has already seen, in the conference of 5 November 1937, contained in our Document Number 386-PS, Exhibit USA-25, the Hossbach minutes of that conference, which I adverted to in detail on Monday last.

In those minutes, we see the crystallization of the plan to wage aggressive war in Europe, and to seize both Austria and Czechoslovakia, and in that order.

U.S. Prosecutor Sidney Alderman
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. II
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/11-29-45.htm
November 29, 1945


JUST THE PLANNING IS A WAR CRIME.

Bush, Cheney, and their neoconster fellow war criminals did way more than plan their war of aggression on Iraq. They did it.

They are doing the same with Syria.

"Democracy," "God," ......., no such mandate can justify war of aggression. No such mandate can justify even planning war of aggression.

War of aggression is illegal and immoral. Period.

IT IS TRIBUNAL TIME IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

I call upon all lawyers, all law enforcement officers, all citizens of stature and means to join together in forming The American War Crimes Tribunal.

Here are the guidelines (thanks to DUer "mod mom" for the reference):

http://www.caii.com/CAIIStaff/Dashboard_GIROAdminCAIIStaff/Dashboard_CAIIAdminDatabase/resources/ghai/toolbox23.htm

"We the People ..." must hold our Nation and our fellow citizens accountable. That is the only path that leads to America being 'the America' we and the world truly want to have as a responsible, lawful partner in advancing the well-being of humanity and the planet.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nominated.
Bang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nominated.
Peace u.l.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Impeach and remove...
...the Fascist, Fraudulent, Fear-Mongering Bush Regime!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Great Find... Just one thought
Prosecution will need to disprove all the "Imminent Threat" b.s., which shouldn't be hard given all the generals, military advisors and planners who were all marginalized by Rummie. Just the fact that NO WMDs have been found ought to be enough to get past that point... but it goes to what the Administration Officials believed... which can be hard to prove EVEN IF they made up all the intelligence. They will need military officials to say "We told Bush, Cheney, et al that Iraq was not an imminent threat but they wouldn't listen."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Yes. I think one begins here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5466206

And, then moves to the various "Downing Street" documents including "fixing the intelligence" to the implementation of increased attacks on Iraqi command and control in August, 2002, continuing into the Fall of 2002. For starters.

I think intent and deeds are readily and abundantly demonstrable before March 19, 2003.

Thank you for your insightful comments.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. And, then one goes to "The Left Coaster" for an extensive series on:
WMDgate: Fixing Intelligence Around Policy

Here's a link to the latest:

http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/006141.php#more


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
54. WMDgate: Fixing Intelligence Around Policy: The Pathological Condi Rice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
76. Niger Forgeries Update at 'the left coaster':
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is voting for it also a war crime... or at least a moral crime?
Just askin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Good question. Given how much information intelligence professionals ..
... like VIPS provided to all of us prior to March 19, 2003, your question will certainly require considerable legal and ethical scrutiny during the proceedings of The American War Crimes Tribunal.

For a quick link to key Veteran Intelligence Professionals (VIPS) memoranda to the President of the United States, just check the .pdf file, below.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
41. GREAT question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. UL: Here's some hard evidence. Powell's Military Assistant
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 01:38 AM by autorank



Cheney accused on prisoner abuse
Col Lawrence Wilkerson

Col Wilkerson has been critical of Mr Cheney in the past

A top aide to former Secretary of State Colin Powell has launched a
stinging attack on US Vice-President Dick Cheney over abuse of
prisoners by US troops.

Col Lawrence Wilkerson accused Mr Cheney of ignoring a decision by
President Bush on the treatment of prisoners in the war on terror.

Asked by the BBC's Today if Mr Cheney could be accused of war
crimes, he said: "It's an interesting question."


"Certainly it is a domestic crime to advocate terror," he added.

"And I would suspect, for whatever it's worth, it's an international crime as well."

From original post: " the planning, preparation, initiation or
waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international
treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan"
Article 6, Neremberg Tribunal



"I look at the relationship between Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld
as being one that produced these two failures in particular, and I see
that the president is not holding either of them accountable...
so I have to lay some blame at his feet too."
Col Wilkerson

Wilkerson interview text

This is an extraordinary attack by a man who until earlier in the year
was Mr Cheney's colleague in the senior reaches of the Bush team, the
BBC's Justin Webb in Washington says.

Col Wilkerson has in the past accused the vice-president of
responsibility for the conditions which led to the abuse of
prisoners.

But this time he has gone much further, appearing to suggest Mr Cheney
should face war crimes charges, our correspondent adds.

<snip>

(and now for the home run, check it out)

In the BBC interview, Col Wilkerson also developed his views on
whether or not pre-war intelligence was deliberately misused by the
White House.

He said that he had previously thought only honest mistakes were made.


But recent revelations about doubts in the intelligence community
that appear to have been suppressed in the run-up to the war have
made him question this view.


---------------------------

This makes the case. I was stunned when I heard it on the radio and
then read it. Wilkerson is more than they bargained for, a military
man who sees being a good soldier as serving one's country not one's leader.

Thanks UL and Thanks so much Col. Wilkerson.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Damn, that green guy is the last face i'll see before going to bed!
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 03:40 AM by autorank
Here's one for you (although you don't deserve it, you Swamp Rat):



Take that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. NOOO! Sorry sorry sorry!!! Look at this!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. SR and autorank ... thanks for the images and fun!!
Some humor is definitely necessary to help us through these difficult times.

Thank you.


Peace, my friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
27. What strikes me in this article though, is that Wilkerson is deflecting
blame away from bu$h. He states he lays "some blame" at bu$h's feet. I take issue with this. * is commander in thief-so where does the buck stop? He has to be aware of the allegations of torture and abuse, so his inaction in remedying these horrific acts, makes him culpable.

I am starting to get the impression that these evildoers: cheney and rumsfeld have been used by the BFEE as a way of promoting their evil agenda while leaving a distance from the bu$h family. We repeated comment on this forum about the mental capacity of w, but what if, like the old SNL skit of Reagan, behind closed doors it is the bush family pulling the strings. I have been following the excellent posts of the JFK assassination put out here by Octafish, as well as some of the BCCI posts. While the * family has had generational involvement, cheney and rumsfeld are virtual newcomers to this web of deceit and destruction. what once sounded like conspiracy to me has just too many "coincidences" to qualify as far-fetched.

I don't mean to diminish the roles of cheney and rumsfeld, but I hate to see blame deflected from BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. That's why the get the "big bucks" -- Cheney and Rummy
Taking the blame. After all we had Rummy pictured with Saddam in the early 80's. These are extremely high level, very expensive operatives.

I'm just amazed that Wilkerson is saying anything like this. It's not part of the 'insider code.' I think they hired themselves a 'live wire.'

He'll have more to say which will be helpful I suspect.

* and Co will get it's justice for Iraq, Katrina, and all the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. PNAC is the prefix to the CHARGES of War Crimes
pre-planning, then the Energy minutes of Cheney. then DSM, a clear and consistent plan leading to a war of aggression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. collective security...kinda has a ring to it, doncha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken_Hero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. nominated...
great post, i love it, and saved also...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. What took place in Fallujah
was most definitely a war crime. Tonight we saw three documentaries by nonembedded journalists of what went on before, during and after the seige, some of the most horrifying and heart-wrenching reporting I've seen. It's impossible for me to accept that this is being carried out in the name of my country. What have we sunk to? The entire neocon cabal should be in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Agreed. Their actions are vastly criminal. My only point is that ...
... long before they killed or harmed anyone, their planning of war of aggression is deserving of prosecution.

"Never again" needs to become an American motto.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I agree absolutely...
This has been premeditated murder all the way. It's getting hard for them to hide their psychopathic souls. They want control of that oil, and they don't care who they have to kill to get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
21. Sent the link to both Senator Kerry and Senator Reed and suggested ...
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 04:18 AM by understandinglife
... that later today, at their press conference (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2281820) they both step to the right side of history.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Sent you some additional contacts within their office.
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 10:05 AM by mod mom
ps-don't you sleep?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. Much thanks. I've forwarded the info to those individuals. And, ....
... not much (i.e., sleep). I'll get plenty - someday ;)


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
22. Never Again!
I too, call upon all lawyers, all law enforcement officers, all citizens of stature and means to join together in forming The American War Crimes Tribunal.


Thank you Understandinglife!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. too true
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 04:42 AM by stellanoir
why pray tell does this reticent and noble truth allude so many. . . ?

perhaps for not much longer

thanks for posting this.

peace on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
24. An important point that they will try to bury. K & N. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
25. YES TRIBUNAL FOR WAR CRIMES
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 06:09 AM by zippy890
Is it even slightly possible that we could do this? It is the right and just thing to do, as American citizens it is our duty to hold our leaders accountable.

The notion that we could form an 'American War Crimes Tribunal' gives me hope for our nation. My eyes actually filled with tears reading this post, thanks UL for putting this together so eloquently.

by the way, I was looking for your post on Wilkerson suggesting Cheney should be charged with war crime -

edited - I just read post #6 above about Wilkerson's comment on Cheney

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
26. It sure is
and the US helped to set that standard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
28. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
31. The American War Crimes Tribunal: A step towards "never again"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yes. It is the first step on the path we must take if we are truly America
Accountability better begin at home or we are no different than every other tyrant Nation in history that had to await others to spank them.

Our decision. Time is short.

Thank you.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
32. To the Hague NOW!!! k&n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clara T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
34. All the evidence is out there in plain sight
Where are those who hold the keys to start the proceedings?

They are deathly silent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
63. "They" may be US.
Daunting to contemplate, but I am beginning to believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
35. More evidence for the prosecution:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. More evidence: "Torture, Rape, and Murder, a timeline in headlines"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Excellent timeline of war crimes. I have never been able to figure
out how to navigate (if a site isn't user friendly I don't use it as often) Daily Kos. thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. L Johnson: How Rummy Greenlighted Abu Ghraib
<clip>

There you have it. A Secretary of Defense who believes that U.S. soldiers have no obligation to do anything other than file a report if they encounter torture or other inhumane treatment.

General Pace's public slap down was a remarkable moment. He signaled very clearly that a limit of the U.S. military's cooperation with civilian leadership in the war in Iraq has been reached, at least on the issue of torture. Up to this point he has been willing to back up Rummy's claim that troop training is going swell, despite evidence to the contrary. But on the issue of torture and abuse he drew a public line in the sand. U.S. soldiers and Marines have an obligation, a duty, to stop inhumane treatment regardless of who is doing it. General Pace understands, whereas Rummy is clueless, that once that line is crossed the military's ability to maintain public support would be in jeopardy.

With the benefit of hindsight, it is clear that Rummy's attitude that there is no obligation to stop inhumane treatment was clearly conveyed to U.S. soldiers in the first days in Iraq. Unfortunately, those Generals in charge at that time, such as General Sanchez, did not have the guts and the spine to stand up to Rummy and let him know that U.S. troops will not tolerate nor engage in inhumane treatment. This is a hopeful sign. Maybe more Generals are coming to understand that the future of the Army is at stake.

More at the link:

http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2005/11/how_rummy_green.html


I'll be trying to get a copy of this thread to General Pace, asap.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Laura Rozen: "European investigations of CIA "black site" prisons and ...
... detention policies proliferate. The NYT and WaPo report that the State Department is responding to increasingly urgent inquiries from European allies, but ... would we be surprised to learn that the State Department is being kept in the dark? If there's one things scholars of the Reagan administration know, it's that it's sometimes better not to know, right?

Posted by Laura at November 30, 2005 01:08 AM

Links at her site:
http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/003169.html



Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. ""The mood in Europe is one of increasing concern over what people call
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 02:28 PM by understandinglife
... the American 'gulag' and the reports of all these stopovers in Europe for prisoners."

Oh for the days when all a girl had to worry about was blowing up her hair dryer with the wrong power adapter. How is she going to explain the efficacy of "playing a little smackey-face" to people who've never even seen NYPD Blue?

Jane Hamsher has a way with words! More at the Condi's European Vacation link:

http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/2005/11/condis-european-vacation.html



Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
38. The enormity and brazenness of the crimes make it difficult to even
wrap one's mind around the truth, but slowly we will make it happen, with excellent work like this.

Thanks, UL.


:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
43. DemFromCT: "So we'll train Shi'a forces (with no loyalty to the state) and
... death squads to torture and kill Sunnis, pat ourselves on the back for preventing civil war and then draw down? I wish that was hyperbole, but the news from Vietnam Iraq says otherwise – check the supplied links (below).


Message to the WH: no one believes you care. But no one believes you know what you're doing, either. if there's a better policy in Vietnam Iraq, your subordinates haven't informed you; they didn't want to spoil your nap or your work-out, and you might have yelled at them.


What's that? There are complaints that this piece isn't a serious dissertation of American policy in Vietnam Iraq? Well, guess what? Neither is the President's speech.

A dose of history and embedded links in Back To The Future In Iraq here:

http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/2005/11/back_to_the_fut.html#more


How could it be otherwise with Negroponte on the team (http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/28/1449257) ....


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. "It wouldn't seem possible that the president would continue to lie to us
... about Iraq. It's as if he thinks we'll get tired of pointing out that he's lying before he gets tired of telling the lie. The lie, of course, is Osama bin-Laden.

From National Strategy For Victory In Iraq by Stephen Elliott on November 30, 2005

More at the link:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-elliott/national-strategy-for-vic_b_11459.html


In addition to war crimes, we also have this little issue to remedy, i.e., that our President and Vice and several of their neoconster buddies persistently destroy America by their lies, their misuse of our Armed Forces, and their squandering of the treasury. It would be hard to imagine a more robust enemy-from-within than these dudes.


Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. The Guardian: Iraq Misses Deadline on Torture Probe
Iraq Misses Deadline on Torture Probe

Wednesday November 30, 2005 9:16 PM

By HAMZA HENDAWI

Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Iraq's government missed a two-week deadline Wednesday to complete an investigation into torture allegations at an Interior Ministry lockup, a probe which Amnesty International warned may show a pattern of abuse of prisoners by government forces.

The Shiite-led government has insisted the claims are exaggerated; nevertheless, the charges are discrediting U.S. efforts to restore human rights in the country after the collapse of Saddam Hussein's regime.

A Sunni Arab politician, Mohammed al-Mishehdani of the Sunni-led National Council for National Dialogue, said simple cases of torture reported in the past were never solved so he had few expectations for this investigation, especially since a general election is due in two weeks.

More at the link:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5448204,00.html



Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. It saddens me to think of the poor Iraqi people being delivered from
Saddam only to find a worse situation. They still live under the fear of state sponsored terrorism but now have to contend with outside terrorists, a civil war and total economic instability. Is this Bush's vision of freedom on the march? Now he beats the war drums for Syria. I only hope we can prevent this spread of freedom "a la bu$h" before we bring death and destruction to another nation. Perpetual war for profit reasons-How can the American people sit back and allow this to happen in our name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
46. Thanks everyone for these links
much reading tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
49. "Costly Withdrawal Is the Price To Be Paid for a Foolish War"
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 05:38 PM by understandinglife
Costly Withdrawal Is the Price To Be Paid for a Foolish War

by Martin van Creveld


The number of American casualties in Iraq is now well more than 2,000, and there is no end in sight. Some two-thirds of Americans, according to the polls, believe the war to have been a mistake. And congressional elections are just around the corner.

What had to come, has come. The question is no longer if American forces will be withdrawn, but how soon — and at what cost. In this respect, as in so many others, the obvious parallel to Iraq is Vietnam.

<clip>

Maintaining an American security presence in the region, not to mention withdrawing forces from Iraq, will involve many complicated problems, military as well as political. Such an endeavor, one would hope, will be handled by a team different from — and more competent than — the one presently in charge of the White House and Pentagon.

For misleading the American people, and launching the most foolish war since Emperor Augustus in 9 B.C sent his legions into Germany and lost them, Bush deserves to be impeached and, once he has been removed from office, put on trial along with the rest of the president's men. If convicted, they'll have plenty of time to mull over their sins.

Martin van Creveld, a professor of military history at the Hebrew University, is author of "Transformation of War" (Free Press, 1991). He is the only non-American author on the U.S. Army's required reading list for officers.


More at the link:
http://www.forward.com/articles/6936


Crystal clear.


Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. "On the one hand, given that we’re supporting torture, death squads ...
... creating terrorists, it’s kinda silly to get excited about the fact that we are subverting the notion of a “free press” in Iraq here. On the other, well, you can’t believe a damn thing these people say about anything.

For me, the only serious question to be asked about any Bush speech about it Iraq is how long does it take to disprove its central claims. In the case of tonight’s speech about how we are going to train our way out of this catastrophe, I’d say, “five seconds,” thanks to my buddy Jim Fallows, who, need I remind everyone, did the most thorough pre-war job of laying out the likelihood of postwar chaos and catastrophe, thereby demonstrating the potential value of long-form journalism to our democracy, as well as our political system’s imperviousness to evidence and reasoned argument, alas.

From A Foolish War's Price by Eric Alterman on November 30, 2005

Link:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-alterman/a-foolish-wars-price_b_11484.html


Mr Alterman finds van Creveld's admonishment as devestating as most of us do.


Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #49
57. Norman Horowitz: "We used to be “the good guys,” but not so any more."
<clip>

We as a nation should find a way to apologize to the Iraqi people. We invaded their country for all the wrong reasons. I expect that it is not possible, however The United States should start out with an apology, and then, just as Seymour tried to do with the wrong dog, give them money, rebuild their infrastructure, build hospitals, schools, etc after we leave.

The administration loves the notion of avoiding blame, and not dealing with the “now what” situation. They just change the subject. They keep telling our country how well things are going and that we must stay the course, whatever that means.

We have done the wrong thing for the wrong reasons at the wrong time while killing untold thousands of people, and wounding countless others.

We used to be “the good guys,” but not so any more. I know that it would be nearly impossible for any government to say, “I’m sorry”, yet we should.

From Insurgent by Norman Horowitz on November 30, 2005

Much more at the link:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/norman-horowitz/insurgent_b_11486.html


Reminded me of:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=5390576

I remain convinced that in addition to Americans holding Bush and the neoconsters accountable before an American Tribunal, we must go before the representatives of the world's Nations and begin our exit strategy from Iraq with an unambiguous, substantive apology.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
50. You have made the single most important point that can be made
about this criminal regime.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthnproof Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Then, Allow Me
Rewrite:

And so by means of careful preparation in the diplomatic field, among others, the PNAC conspirators had woven a position for themselves, so that they could seriously consider plans for war and begin to outline time tables, not binding time tables and not specific ones in terms of months and days, but still general time tables, in terms of years, which were the necessary foundation for further aggressive planning, and a spur to more specific planning.

And that time table was developed, as the Tribunal has already seen, was founded in 1997, contained in our Document Number 386-PS, Exhibit USA-25, the minutes of that conference, which I adverted to in detail on Monday last.

In those minutes, we see the crystallization of the plan to wage aggressive war in in the Middle East, and to seize both Iraq and Iran, and in that order.

U.S. Prosecutor
PNAC Trial Proceedings Vol. II
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/proc/11-29-45.htm
November 30, 2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. " ... and to seize Iraq, Syria, and Iran, and in that order."
Welcome to DU, truthnproof!

Just suggesting you add Syria to the list, because it is very much on the list, as "Clean Break" (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5466206) makes explicit.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Syria: American operations have spilled over the border (NYT 10/15)
Not only is Syria on the list, but as this 10/15 NYT article points out, American operations have spilled over the border, sometimes by accident and sometimes by design! As the American people slowly wake up, the PNAC agenda marches forward.

October 15, 2005


G.I.'s and Syrians in Tense Clashes on Iraqi Border
By JAMES RISEN and DAVID E. SANGER

WASHINGTON, Oct. 14 - A series of clashes in the last year between American and Syrian troops, including a prolonged firefight this summer that killed several Syrians, has raised the prospect that cross-border military operations may become a dangerous new front in the Iraq war, according to current and former military and government officials.

The firefight, between Army Rangers and Syrian troops along the border with Iraq, was the most serious of the conflicts with President Bashar al-Assad's forces, according to American and Syrian officials.

It illustrated the dangers facing American troops as Washington tries to apply more political and military pressure on a country that President Bush last week labeled one of the "allies of convenience" with Islamic extremists. He also named Iran.

One of Mr. Bush's most senior aides, who declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the subject, said that so far American military forces in Iraq had moved right up to the border to cut off the entry of insurgents, but he insisted that they had refrained from going over it.

But other officials, who say they got their information in the field or by talking to Special Operations commanders, say that as American efforts to cut off the flow of fighters have intensified, the operations have spilled over the border - sometimes by accident, sometimes by design. (*DID YOU READ THAT? SOMETIMES BY ACCIDENT, SOMETIMES BY DESIGN!!!)

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/15/politics/15syria.html?pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Indeed. And, Arkin's "Wag the Damascus?" article is quite informative ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. On Iran: State Dept official attacks Iran's President. Laying the ground
work: (*thanks to Sabra on LBN)

State Department official attacks Iran's president

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/10270207 /

State Department official attacks Iran's president

Iran's new president, Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, is an irresponsible radical who is digging a hole for himself, a senior US official declared on Wednesday.

Nicholas Burns, the State Department's number three official, launched a particularly personal attack in a speech that focused on Iran's alleged pursuit of nuclear weapons, its support for "terrorist" groups, including Hamas and al-Qaeda, and its poor human rights record.

"Through his statements and actions, President Ahmadi-Nejad is digging a hole for himself and he appears determined to keep on digging," Mr Burns told the School of Advanced International Studies at John Hopkins University.
Mr Burns, who liaises with the European Union in its nuclear talks with Iran, said the Bush administration would spend more dollars on supporting the pro-democracy efforts of the Iranian people in the hope they would change their own government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
58. We the people
Must hold ourselves accountable, and judge accordingly. peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
60. Lebensraum = OIL.
They might not be Nazis, but they are the closest thing to Nazis that have come down the pike since the "Third Reich" went down in flames, for doing the same things the neocons are willing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. Your equation is almost perfect. I suggest Lebensraum = Oil+Water+Strike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #65
69. Thanks for the links...
Ron Paul outlines the mess we're in perfectly. Bush's plan is the plan of a lifelong loser! I guess that sadly, we all witness now, the sobering result, of having a pResident who at best had a C average in his HISTORY classes. He must have had better things to do than to really study. Things like cheerleading and frat pranks.

Lebensraum and the plan to uphold and protect Israel at any cost, drove the neocons and the Office of Special Planning at the Pentagon/White House, to trick and override the will of the people and their representatives. By hook or CROOK the neocons meant to have their way all along. We see now that the neocons have made the same mistakes that every other despotic plunderer in the past has made. Their think tank mentality is as flawed as the selfish rogues from the past who have deserted any form of honor, or morality, in favor of wealth and power. Greed has inspired them, the same as it inspires any common criminal, to commit their crimes.

All the lost can do now, is to continue to walk in their endless circle. The Foxes are chasing their tails, because they have outfoxed themselves.

THINK TANK = CONSPIRACY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
61. excellent
thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
62. Hopefully some day
the winners will be subject to being tried for war crimes, as well as the losers. Maybe this Administration will rack up so many charges that it will set the precedent and be the first one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
64. Kicking, in admiration and appreciation for this great work.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
66. We must do this...
...if we're ever to salvage our national soul. There must be a thorough accounting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
67. DU Activist Proposal: American War Crimes Tribunal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
68. Tribunal already meeting:
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 07:35 AM by hippywife
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. Based on reading the Charter for this commission and reviewing ..
.. the individuals involved, it appears to me that I should revise my request to Skinner and the DU Activist Group to bring as much attention to this existing Commission as possible.

Do you and others agree with that assessment?


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. I agree. I had not heard of this and am glad that it is under way. We
can all work on promoting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. yes
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 02:44 PM by hiley
sure do.
Michael Ratner is a busy man and is not letting up on the Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. Yes I agree, UL, but
on my quick read of the commission's list, it appears that they have not included your point regarding the crime of PLANNING of a war of aggression.

I think it should be included in the listed crimes. I hope you will forward your OP to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. I agree. And, I have already emailed them a link to that entire thread ...
... and will continue communicating the necessity that they include any form of conceptualization or planning of aggressive war in their investigation and deliberations.

Thank you!


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #70
77. I fully agree
that we should swing our efforts to support the commission already in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. My message to the "Bush Crimes Commission":
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 08:35 PM by understandinglife
Dear Commission members,

I sent the information below, earlier today. Since that time we have expanded the discussion of how we might rapidly expand awareness in America of the need for each of us to hold Bush, Cheney and the neoconsters accountable - along with all their enablers in Congress, in corporations and special interest organizations.

One of our members suggested a very clever and simple idea, and audio/visual postcard - a rather primitive example of which can be viewed here:
http://postcards.AudioGenerator.com/P001/P1127857.htm

The example was developed for Congressman Kucinich's campaign. The ease of one person sending the 'postcard' to as many friends, family members, colleagues, is an attractive feature. And, the choice of who is delivering the message and the video imagery that can be attached expand the potential to deliver something much more compelling than the typical email message.

The technology used is not expensive:

http://mp3soundstream.com

Or, one can rely on AudioGenerator to provide a hosting service as was done in the Rep Kucinich example:

http://audiogenerator.com/default.asp?referringAffiliate=37125&r=

The idea would be for your Commission to create one or more "a/v postcards" and begin distributing the URL for all of your members and others to distribute. I would then create a post at DU and request that all DUers send the links to all their respective email lists. We could significantly expand awareness of the Commission's Jan., 2006, meeting and the need for all Americans to join together and hold our government accountable by being accountable participants, ourself.

I hope you find this information of value and look forward to being supportive.




Peace.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. Sounds really good!
I like the idea of the a/v postcard. In the meantime, I would suggest that everyone send the link the the commission's website to all their compadres in arms.

Thanx for all the work you've put into this! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. thanks
for the links, bookmarking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
80. Larry Beinhart at HuffPo: Judgment at Nuremberg III
Edited on Fri Dec-02-05 03:09 PM by understandinglife
Self-Defense, Preemptive War, Preventive War and the Crime of Aggressive War

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-beinhart/judgment-at-nuremberg-par_b_11559.html


Definitely worth reading.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC