|
are ideal areas to focus on in your study.
If i were selling this idea you have, i'd bone up on drugs war statistics (see DU's drugs war ammunition dump). And then interview someone on camera, recording a video of a person who, during a dialogue learns about the fallacy that they preconcieved of (maybe) as a remotely effective drugs war. The social dissonance is so extreme, o guess what you are calling "personal political bias", i call "social dissonance". looking backwards up the microscope, what is personal, is social, and you seem to be studying the social dynamics of propaganda.
So just find an area where the propaganda is grossly out of phase with the truth, and interview someone on camera bringing them down out of rhetoric land on to truth ground, letting someone see the value of the research, as a social process well... or approach the same research as a list of numbers, questionairres, that allow you to ask a set of people what they "believe"... but ahhh, i only trust an interview on camera myself, as everything else allows the researcher to pawn the half truth that people are not dynamic, mutable, and not subject to such simplistic pathologies, so much depending on the mantle one must wear to survive, to appear like the herd.
You#ve inspired me thinkin' about this.. thanks...
|