|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
PennyMan (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 04:58 PM Original message |
PLEASE PLEASE READ !! THE CASE FOR A NATIONAL RECALL ELECTION |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sir_Snooze (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. He should be impeached and sent to Guantanimo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mb7588a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-02-05 02:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. welcome to DU, and nice sign, Sirsnoozy! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. 4.2 stars (177 votes) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. I believe we should have a national recall vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ISUGRADIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. I still like the process of impeachment and conviction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. No constitutional provision for a recall. Only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. yup, constitutional impossibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
6. Damn straight! Let's do it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stand and Fight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. Don't think this is possible, but I can dream! 5th Recommendation! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
8. Priceless.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
10. I don't think we can have a recall presidential election. He has to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
11. Emotionally I agree. As a Law I completely don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
12. I don't want him recalled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
huskerlaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
13. yeah, one problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
14. We might have a ceremonial recall. It would be as real as election 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-01-05 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
15. The recall election is in 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-02-05 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
16. permanent paid vacation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice Is Comin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-02-05 02:34 AM Response to Original message |
17. Why can't we package him up in a steel cage, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dfgrbac (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-02-05 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
18. The recall is potentially available! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-02-05 03:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Really? And the Congress, Fed, State gov'ts and the Supremes are going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-02-05 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
19. So first they have to pass an ammendment to effect a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-02-05 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
22. HEHE! Look at this part, hehe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC