Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Career Lawyers in DOJ Overruled on Delay Redistricting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 10:49 PM
Original message
Career Lawyers in DOJ Overruled on Delay Redistricting
So, the Washington Post is reporting that career lawyers in the Department of Justice unanimously agreed that Tom Delay's Texas redistricting plan was illegal.

The lawyers at DOJ concluded the Delay plan was illegal, because it violated the Voting Rights Act and diluted African-American and Hispanic voting strength in two districts.

BUT, the lawyers were overruled by senior political appointees at DOJ. The political appointees at Justice approved the plan.

And Mark Posner, who for a long time was a lawyer at DOJ, says those actions are suspect. He says it's very unusual for political appointees at DOJ to overrule career lawyers in the Department.

I'm covering this on my blog:

http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2005/12/02/justice-department-lawyers-overruled-on-texas-re-districting.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I heard this on another show this evening. KO I think.
Sounds like it could mean more trouble for DeLay! I clapped!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Unfortunately, I don't think it means legal trouble
After all, the political appointees (AKA: Bush's lapdogs; BKA: Bush's whores) approved the plan, in spite of the findings of the career lawyers.

It just serves as further proof of what we in the reality-based community already knew: Tom Delay is concerned with one thing only: his political power and viability.

And African-Americans and Hispanics don't support him, so he tries to dilute their voting power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't know about that. There was a reason why the
justice dept lawyers advised against it. I doubt it was because they weren't supporting getting more Pubs elected. It had to be something else! I don't know very much about this part of the laws so I can't even guess, but I do nknow lawyers don't davise against something without a reason.

I'm going to watch this issue and see what happens!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The lawyers advised against Delay's redistricting plan because....
They said it was illegal. They said it violated the Voting Rights Act by suppressing the voting power of African-Americans and Hispanics in 2 districts.


But higher up in the chain of command, the political appointees approved it--which, unfortunately, doesn't come as a shocker.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. THAT's why O said it could mean legal trouble for DeLay AND
the Admin. politicos who ignored them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out .....eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC