Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Louisville narcotics detectives used forged search warrants

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Conservativesux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:36 PM
Original message
Louisville narcotics detectives used forged search warrants
City settles suits over drug cases
Detectives used forged warrants

By Gregory A. Hall

The Courier-Journal

Saturday, November 26, 2005

Louisville metro government has agreed to pay $30,000 to settle two lawsuits involving two former narcotics detectives involved in Jefferson County's largest police scandal in decades.

<snip>

The civil lawsuits stem from more than 50 criminal cases involving former detectives Mark Watson and Christie Richardson in which charges were dismissed or convictions erased because of the two detectives' conduct.

Watson is serving a 20-year sentence after pleading guilty in January 2003 to 299 felonies and three misdemeanors for using photocopied judges' signatures on search warrants and using them to enter people's homes.

Richardson is on probation after a jury convicted her in February 2003 on 20 felony charges, including 19 counts of tampering with public records and one count of criminal possession of a forged instrument. The jury also found her guilty of official misconduct, a misdemeanor.

More at:
http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051126/NEWS01/511260398/1008/NEWS01
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Proving once again that narco-agents are the scum of the earth.....
Lower than maggot shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Conservativesux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Straight up! Anything to "uphold the laws" against certain drugs...
or job security as I think of it.

May they all rot in prison, where they sent many people for the possession of a little pot, the bastards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeighAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. $10,000 is chump change
And the sentence handed down to "Christy Richardson"

"...on probation after a jury convicted her in February 2003 on 20 felony charges, including 19 counts of tampering with public records and one count of criminal possession of a forged instrument."

That seems a little light to me, personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dances with Cats Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. O h, I bet THAT was a first
When USA declared "War" upon its own poplulace it was a dark, dark day! The fallout from a drug charge usually harms teh individual W-A-Y more than the drugs themslelves. Fuck it, I'm gonna go roll a fat one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dances with Cats Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick
for kicks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. The article says "...largest police scandal in decades."
But we've got to remember this is Louisville, where it's OK for cops to pump bullets into a handcuffed suspect.

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/LAW/02/24/police.shooting.ap/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC