Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the most powerful weapon used in a war?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 09:26 AM
Original message
What is the most powerful weapon used in a war?
Edited on Sun Dec-04-05 09:27 AM by HypnoToad
Nukes?

Nope.

Compassion?

Getting warmer, but nope...

Knowledge?

Well, knowledge is a tool. How do you use that tool?

Knowledge is the most dangerous thing any person can have. But if only a person knows how to use it. (so even if our news media bothered to include all points of view and articles we can only seem to find from external (non-US) sources, I doubt our populace - monkeyfied as it has been - would still know what to do with it.)


Edit: Subject line spelling :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Mothers - seriously it takes a man to start a war.
It takes a mother to stop one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Without question: information. In other words...media. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. But our media spits out disinformation.
How come we opted to find other sources and other points of view?

Our desire for knowledge.

Information is used for control.

Knowledge makes us free.

Fascists do not like freedom, therefore they seek to control - hence the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkiGuy Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Propaganda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kahleefornia Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Surprise. Fear
Fear and Surprise, Ruthless Efficiency,and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Lies.
That's what got us where we are today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. IEDs are running a close second though n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Lies....
as we very well have experienced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Bullet
Edited on Sun Dec-04-05 11:32 AM by Ready4Change
When I read weapon I think "the thing which directly kills." Bullets are the most common weapon in use during our worlds most populated eras. These eras have seen more people killed by bullets than actually existed in many other eras. Machine guns simply mowed down men like weeds in the insane charges of WWI. And the unrelentingly continuous single pop of bullets has been an unstopped metronome of death since the 1800's.

Before the time of bullets I probably would have said the knife, as I suspect it has been the domestic weapon of choice as well as a tool of war since our species earliest history. That's without extending "knife" to include bayonets on rifles (which I'd categorize with spears) or swords, which I'd put into their own category.

If you're talking the SINGLE most powerful weapon of course I'd give the nod to either the Hiroshima or Nagasaki atomic bombs. (I forget which city was most populous, I'm afraid.) Those are likely the only 2 times a single instance of a weapon has directly killed hundreds of thousands.

However (thankfully) that's the only two times nukes have actually been used, so even their total destruction as a class of weapons doesn't stack up against the hundreds of millions killed by simple propelled chunks of metal over the last couple centuries.

Simple, accessible, plentiful. Nothing else has ever killed at the rate of bullets, and I suspect, nothing will supplant them in the foreseable future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC