Ritter takes on key conservative WMD talking point

"Democrats accuse the president and his supporters of deliberately misleading them and the American people about the nature of the Iraqi threat. Republicans respond that the Democrats are rewriting history, that all parties involved had access to the same intelligence data and had drawn the same conclusions. Typical of the Republican-led rebuttal are statements made by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who noted that "every intelligence agency in the world, including the Russian, French, including the Israeli, all had reached the same conclusion, and that was that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction."

But this is disingenuous. The intelligence services of everyone else were not proclaiming Iraq to be in possession of WMD. Rather, the intelligence services of France, Russia, Germany, Great Britain and Israel were noting that Iraq had failed to properly account for the totality of its past proscribed weapons programs, and in doing so left open the possibility that Iraq might retain an undetermined amount of WMD. There is a huge difference in substance and nuance between such assessments and the hyped-up assertions by the Bush administration concerning active programs dedicated to the reconstitution of WMD, as well as the existence of massive stockpiles of forbidden weaponry."

http://tinyurl.com/bpamh

their talking points are BS! They've gotten away with this kind of think for so many years, I'd bet they shocked!

owes Scott Ritter an apology. He was the ONLY ONE who turned out to be completely correct about the existence of Iraq's "WMDs." And he was routinely vilified by our own "press."

I can't wait to hear the debate between Ritter and Christopher Hitchens on Air America!

in Iraq. They apparently were not concerned enough about Saddam's threat to the rest of the world. They had serious doubts about his capacity to do any real harm to anyone - anymore. In 1991 he was disabled and with the sanctions was kept disabled. Gee, what a news flash. What is funny is, I believe it was Wolfowitz (sp?) who said the American public wouldn't agree to war unless we were convinced we were being threatened by Saddam. Ya gotta wonder about our media allowing Bush & bunch to link Saddam and 9-11. Rehash I know. Still, having ex generals and people like Ritter out there making noises has helped the cause. Our media eventually gets info out there and then the talking heads disassemble it. Obviously people are getting "it" as bush's poll #'s are dropping.