Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

assuming the Dem nominee is a white man not named Lieberman or Kucinich…

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 10:41 PM
Original message
assuming the Dem nominee is a white man not named Lieberman or Kucinich…
and assuming the BBV shenanigans aren't too bad…

I think Bush is gonna lose in a landslide (at least in terms of the popular vote).

he hasn't given anyone that didn't vote for him in 2000 a reason to, and he's given many of those who did vote for him in 2000 a reason not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess you haven't studied the candidates or the electronic voting
Dean would lose in a debate with Bush. Kucinich would make mincemeat out of Bush in the debates the way the Phoenix audience felt he made mincemeat out of Dean. According to the Phoenix audience Kerry and Kucinich won the debate.

However, in the end, it may not matter who we nominate. We could nominate God and Bush would win if don't get rid of those rigged voting machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. agree with you re: BBV
I also agree that Kucinich would beat Bush in a debate, though I don't agree that Dean would lose to Bush in a debate. but I'm not talking about debates… I'm talking about elections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. your forgetting...
diebold and other questionable voting standards in other places... and the whole california/ahnuld thing... CA is kinda iffy ground now that its in repub hands, if ahnuld gets the state bailed out... it could sway the biggest electoral vote in the country tward the repubs, but unlikley considering it was a budget matter in the first place that got the incumbent in trouble (familiar, huh?)

im still seeing it as a tossup, big buisness is still happy so he will have plenty of money in his campaign wallet

-LK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't think the CA vote has any bearing on the presidential election
Bush is no Schwarzenegger.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC