Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supporting clemency for Death Row killers makes one feel LIKE SHIT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 01:04 AM
Original message
Supporting clemency for Death Row killers makes one feel LIKE SHIT
Edited on Sat Dec-10-05 01:05 AM by Proud2BAmurkin
but opposing the death penalty is the right and moral thing to do.

It feels GOOD to call for the torture and execution of scumbag killers so why doesn't anyone call it "feel good conservatism"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Having heard Tookie speak on the radio I can say...
I feel very good about supporting his clemency.

He is very effective at communicating a message to
people who are at the fringes to avoid taking the
path that he has.

He also communicates to people who are attempting to
restart their lives in a positive way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. I never feel bad about calling for clemency.
It's because it's not an appeal for pardon, it's an appeal for commutation of the sentence to life in prison. Life in prison is no picnic, and society is still protected from the person's viciousness or violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't want clemency because of who he is.
I am against the death penalty because of who I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well said
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. If you're against capital punishment...
there can't be exceptions.

I'm glad they caught the Green River Killer, and I'm very glad that he is not a threat any more.

But, I'm also quite satisfied that they did not have to kill him to remove him as a threat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Nah, you can be against capital punishment
for run-of-the-mill murders, and support it for the mose heinous of crimes. It IS possible. I think that if all executions were public affairs, we'd see them pretty much go by the wayside.

I favor the death penalty for Treason, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Then you run into the trap of...
trying to define the most heinous crimes. That's not easy.

Besides, it's not my point-- which is more to the point of someone who is against the concept of the DP but then finds an exception here and there when convenient. You sound like you aren't that much against the DP itself, just some applications of it.

As for public executions...

http://www.geocities.com/lastpublichang/

"On August 14, 1936, Rainey Bethea was hanged in Owensboro, Kentucky, before a crowd of 20,000. The public outrage which followed resulted in the complete abolition of public executions in the United States. This site provides the complete text of the book, The Last Public Execution in America."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. See - if they were public, we wouldn't have so many
Which was my point. I'm never sure about absolutes - that we should always or never do something. And defining the most heinous of crimes would change with the times. I'm ok with that.

I really don't have much of a dog in the capital punishment fight. I generally think it's a waste of money, but it doesn't bother me as much as say, torture, or imprisonment without trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC