Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FACTS that are missing from the Iraq debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 03:43 PM
Original message
FACTS that are missing from the Iraq debate
Edited on Sat Dec-10-05 03:45 PM by yurbud
I don't know what the best way to end the war in Iraq is.

Some of the facts I have in mind have been covered in the press on page A13 or further back, but have only been acknowledged by a handful of Democrats, not the leadership, and NO republicans.

I'm willing to listen to any proposals provided they squarely and upfront acknowledge the FACTs. Conversely, the less I hear about these things, the more I suspect the person talking is lying.

OIL



  • If we just leave, the consequences could be far more severe than in Vietnam because of the OIL.

  • The world's oil supply has either peaked or is about to, and as it declines, the Middle East will be the last region sucked dry. Those who supported the war thought controlling that oil was important for continued US access and our national security as Colin Powell's chief of staff Col. Wilkerson recently said.

    Peak oil & Iraq articles:
    http://www.mymethow.com/~joereid/oil_coup.html

    Wilkerson:
    http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2005/11/powell-aide-says-war-about-oil-so-we.html

    Neocons have gone further and said that being in control of the oil spigot gives us an effective veto over the growth of other countries including potential rivals like China.

    Oil companies probably wanted Iraq's oil for crasser reasons: stocks are low elsewhere so they need the product, and Iraq's oil will grow exponentially in value as other countries oil reserves dry up. Recent price gouging by oil companies shows how much they care about the rest of us.

    Background on oil company machinations regarding Iraq:

    http://www.gregpalast.com/iraqmeetingstimeline.html

    http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2005/crudedesigns.htm

  • Restructuring Iraq's oil during a military occupation to favor our oil companies is probably a war crime.

    http://www.harpers.org/BaghdadYearZero.html

    The Hague Convention of 1907 (IV) see articles 47, 53, 55
    http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/195?OpenDocument

    The Geneva Convention of 1949 (IV) we've broken almost every section of article 147, and Bush has personally broken article 148.
    http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/380?OpenDocument

    We cannot break such fundamental, long-standing treaties such as these and then complain when other countries violate the treaties we like.

  • Because of pressure from the oil companies, failure of the media to cover the issue adequately, and public inertia, we have failed to prepare for declining oil supplies by switchng to other energy sources, or even add them to the mix in a significant way.

IRAQIS


ARAB & WORLD OPINION




I've probably left some out. Feel free to add to this list.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC