Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Without victory in 2006 IMPEACHMENT is off the table. . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 10:33 AM
Original message
Without victory in 2006 IMPEACHMENT is off the table. . .
. . .so I would encourage all of you who want to see * impeached you need to focus your energies on taking back the House and the Senate in 2006. Even then its a longshot, but with Republican majorities in both houses impeachment will never happen without a Democratic landslide. People can scream for impeachment, but that is unrealistic as long as the GOP is in charge.

There has been a lot of discussion about DINO's, the DCCC and the DLC and the role they will play in 2006. I think we need to start working to come together as a party, the DCCC and DLC aint going anywhere so its time for everyone to find a common ground, a common purpose and map to victory. I know it sucks for some of my fellow DUers but instead of bashing the DCCC and DLC its time for us to figure out how to co-exist and to move forward as a party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree ~ keep our eye on the prize,cut the bashing


Other than Joey, I don't care what Democrat wins if we can turn the Congress to our side.

That is the issue.
That is where the power is.

I don't care if they were for the war from the start and just found sanity or pro gun or whatever.

If they are on our side and can get elected -cut the "eating our own" and get the party started again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The interesting thing about Joey is. . .
. . .I can't stand the guy, however he is a Dem with high approval ratings in his state, should we spend our time and our resources bashing/challenging him when we have seats we need to win? Lets get a majority first then go after him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You are right again :) , I 'll stay off of Joey's back too :) nt
Edited on Sun Dec-11-05 10:46 AM by goclark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think that's exactly backward.
Unless we fight for our elections and for impeachment, there will be no Democratic landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. that's right. there will be no change if we are timid in our convictions
three more years in his term dictates that we use any and all levers to pry Bush loose from power. There was absolutely nothing that affected the country so much that Clinton did that should have triggered our Democrats to agree to impeachment hearings, but they did because they were pressured politically.

We can do the same to republicans. We just need the majority of our Democrats to stand firm and we will see the unraveling of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. we don't KNOW if democrats will impeach.
as much as i might want them to --

i have never seriously entertained the thought that a bush impeachment is in the cards.

given the votes on the war -- i'm not so sure it's something that should be banked on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Very much agree with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Me too.
The Democrats we now have don't seem to have the stomach for impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. True, but Democratic majorities further the overall progressive agenda. .
. . .even if everyone one of the elected Dems are not as progressively pure as some would like, it furthers the overall progressive agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. You couldn't get the DLC jolers to vote for impeachment and the Senate
ones would say fergeddabout it before it all began even if you could get impeachment passed. They're corporate and this is what they want...including the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. True but they need to maintain the illusion of consensus
and more important, of governability. If enough of us got busy and were visible, they would have to get off their butts. That's how it's always worked. Even if our votes aren't counted, they have to mind the illusion that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. And without addressing the computer voting machine issue
Victory in 2006 is off the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. There is still that little issue
of who controls the voting machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkansas Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. "working to come together as a party" sounds good to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Welcome to DU, Clarkansas.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. Does Diebold come at all in all this sunny thread, or we pretend
W won fair and square and "we just work harder"?
Just checking how realistic this actually is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. This is not a sunny thread. . .
. . .we know that counting the votes matter, but if the party is divided there will not be enough energy out there to make sure the votes are counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Any election talk that ignores what happened NON STOP since 2000
Edited on Sun Dec-11-05 12:26 PM by robbedvoter
is as unrealistic as the expectation of impeachment (with or without dem majority)
I will not be lulled with election dreams anymore.

Note to Kerry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. I am very sorry but we are pretty well aware
Edited on Sun Dec-11-05 12:40 PM by G_j
Please STOP telling us Impeachment is unrealistic. There are plenty enough reasons for people to get involved without telling them not to be demanding impeachment right now!

I am very sorry but are pretty well aware. Do you think we don't know the Rs control things? duh...

It would make a MAJOR IMPACT to see the word IMPEACH everywhere you look in this country. We are the people! I'm not pinning my hopes merely on a bunch of politicians!

We the people say we want Impeachment!!!
!


end of rant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. HUH? Who called you an idiot? Whot told you keep your mouth shut?
What is being smoked today. Calling for unity is in no way telling anyone to keep their mouth shut. What type of paranoia do need to be on to think that? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. No you didn't call us idiots
Edited on Sun Dec-11-05 12:42 PM by G_j
I just edited two lines for clarity and manners

Aside from that, telling me that impeachment is unrealistic because the Rs are in charge feels like it implies that I am not aware of this very obvious and simple fact.
And I might add that it is completely unrealistic to expect that Dems would impeach anyway. i didn't read the main gist of your post as being a request for unity.

Frankly I don't expect impeachment either way.!
But I would like the demand of the people become a roar!

excuse my obvious anger but I've heard this one too many times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Though no one asked me,
I'll have to be rude and butt in. I think that the chances for impeachment are increased by a process that I am confident both of you agree with. On one hand, there is a growing awareness that some folks in the administration lied to the American people in order to promote an agenda that was not in the nation's best interest. On the other hand, a segment of society if very aware that the march to war included serious crimes that should be grounds for impeachment.

Should the drive be to impeach Bush? Cheney? Both? This is an area that people might disagree on, especial on who should be the first target. But the methods should be an area we agree on: the most important thing to be doing now is preparing to change the face of the House and the Senate in '06. And one of the important resources we now have -- much more so than two years ago -- is "proof" that the republicans are as corrupt as they are.

I'm all for unity with all of those who are moving towards the same goals. I do think that we should take note of the fact that there are some democrats who are more suportive of the administration's actions in Iraq than some republicans. It seems likely that they may be more inclined to cover for the impeachable offenses, than some republicans. The most obvious example is Sen. Joe Lieberman. I would think that he should be identified as an enemy of progress on these issues. The fact that he calls himself a democrat in public doesn't outweigh his actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. good points
Edited on Sun Dec-11-05 12:56 PM by G_j
and I'll have to admit I am very cynical!

I have periodically advocated for a movement to demand impeachment over the last few years. To answer the question, I think the 'meme' should be "Impeach The Bush Administration"

You see i don't think it will happen. I hope and pray I am wrong.
I am coming from a place of planting thoughts, sort of a marketing thing I guess. I see the possibility of repeating something enough times that it becomes a story in itself (much as the Republicans do).

I will never tell people not to work toward the 06 election.
I do think you make powerful points about WHO we are pitting our hopes upon. And election fraud and reform issues are tantamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC