Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O'Reilly is in trouble with my school district (attorney involved)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 08:53 AM
Original message
O'Reilly is in trouble with my school district (attorney involved)
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 08:57 AM by rainbow4321
Dear Plano ISD eNews Subscribers

On Friday, December 9, on the Fox News Channel's "The O'Reilly Factor," with Bill O'Reilly and guest Jim Pinkerton, Fox 4 News analyst, it was falsely reported in a segment entitled "More Victories for Christmas" that ...

....."In Plano, Texas, a school told students they couldn't wear red and green because they are Christmas colors."......

Due to the number of e-mails, inquiries and phone calls to Plano ISD regarding students "wearing red and green," Superintendent of Schools Dr.
Doug Otto is e-mailing this communication to eNews subscribers (and has posted this message on the PISD website) to assure the school community that this rumor is false.

"The school district does not restrict students or staff from wearing certain color clothes during holiday times or any other school days," noted Dr. Otto, who said that the school district's attorney has requested that Mr. O'Reilly retract the statement.

Dr. Otto said that our attorney requested of Mr. O'Reilly that, in the future, he ask his fact checkers to do a more thorough job of confirming the facts before he airs them.

"It would be our hope that you would engage in fair and balanced reporting of this nationally recognized school district in the future," PISD's attorney wrote to Mr. O’Reilly.

-----------
http://www.billoreilly.com/show?action=getShowByShowTopic&showTopicID=2252#1

"While the secular media continues to spout that there is no Christmas controversy, in the real world we have proved there is. More evidence: Apparently Sears and Target, two operations that were not saying 'Merry Christmas,' have turned around and are now Christmas kind of people. This is about respect. Banishing the words 'Merry Christmas' is simply disrespectful to people who celebrate that federal holiday. In Wisconsin, an elementary school changed the name of 'Silent Night' to 'Cold In The Night.' In Plano, Texas, a school told students they couldn't wear red and green because they are Christmas colors. That's flat-out fascism. If I were a student in Plano, I'd be a walking Christmas tree after that order. Talking Points understands that you know what is going on here. The good news is that we're actually winning, and nearly every time we embarrass the secular forces they cave. Only a few stores are now banning 'Merry Christmas' - they are listed on BillOreilly.com. We are defending Christmas, we are exposing the people who are disrespecting the federal holiday and the media that covers it up. And we'll continue to do that."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Only people that work less than Limbaugh's fact-checkers
Are O'Reilly's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. And GW's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
50. SO WHO HERE SETUP "BILLY_SAVES_XMAS"?
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 01:25 PM by bushmeat
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
68. The very idea of "fact checkers" at Fox News is absurd. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder how many of these other stories are lies too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I'll Guess Over Half!
And, the ones that are rooted in true statements, 100% of the time, would be concluded incorrectly. He's dumber than dirt.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WernhamHogg Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Does
Does O'Reilly (or Fox "News" for that matter) even EMPLOY fact checkers? Whenever I happen to hear him, it seems like he is just pulling his "facts" right out of his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. He usually is
Media Matters usually has one good o'Reilly whopper up per day. Guy is pathological.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Well maybe like Colbert
he doesn't like facts.

He can't prove it but he can say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. They employ "fact fabricators"
Based on their core demographic (dangerously violent white males), they review what possible scenarios could most outrage their audience. They then spend a great deal of time fabricating the most lurid possible story around this scenario, designed to send their audience's blood pressure sky high.

It's a type of pornography, and has just as much a basis in reality.

I'd call it "fascist pornography"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. What's funny...
is him even trying to talk about something like "respect."

Since we know he has none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JetboyOne Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. O'reily is an asshat
but why..WHY would lawyers have to get involved with this silliness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Why?
How about the thousands of emails pouring into school mail servers sent from ignorant pieces of crap that listen to O'Reilly? How about the time spent having to deal with this bald faced lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JetboyOne Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. So how hard is it
to ignore email for a couple of days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Let's try an expirement shall we?
How about you post your email on the freep site with a statement that you hate Jesus, Christmas and Smirky and we can judge the results. Sounds like fun!!! I predict that you will find that even this comparatively miniscule experience might change your mind. The only problem is that the freepers have never been interested in debate and they have a policy of immediately "disappearing" any posts even remotely critical of "Der Smirkenfuhrer".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JetboyOne Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. It brings me back
to the question. What will involving lawyers do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
61. Hopefully it will make O'Reilly learn the importance of truth
He should be fined or made to prove his claim.
emdee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #24
65. Maybe teach his slanderous ass a lesson? Remind him that there
are consequences to his actions?

What, you think HE doesn't have lawyers? :eyes:

Oh, and welcome to DU yadda yadda yadda...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #24
67. "What will involving lawyers do?"
I don't know. Maybe you should ask the RW whackos like Falwell et al. They're ALWAYS talking about suing "liberals" over some non-issue.

I don't understand where you're coming from. Or came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. It's called slander. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JetboyOne Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. I doubt it. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. I remember wearing a cross on my forehead on ash wed in public school
No one ever said anything deragotory to me and this was back in cicero. Are kids still allowed to do this? If so someone should till oreilly to shut up. I am glad your school board is standing up to the mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
28. I doubt anyone would say anything
Most schools have the rules set that student prayer or student's personal displays of religious beliefs or rites simply have to not "disrupt the educational process."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dissent Is Patriotic Donating Member (793 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. What I want to know is
what kind of people actually work on these shows. To me these people are worse than the host because they can actually see before their eyes these liars weaving their tales. Ugghh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. That's like is assertion that the "boycott of France and things French"
is actually hurting them.

He contrives these stupid non-controversies and then supports them with lies. A certain number of people will buy into it because it's "on the TV."

He's a loon.

"We distort, you comply."

Happy Holidays, BO.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. I went to Sears the other day, and was quite amused
They had a sign that said "Merry Christmas" on every pane of glass at their entrance, and had about five or six "Merry Chrstmas" signs right as you walk in.

It seemed almost sarcastic, which is the impression I got after talking to some employees...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Wisconsin school did NOT change "Silent Night"
I would have objected if it did.

What the school did do was use a song -- that was written for another program and copyrighted in 1988 -- that used the same TUNE as "Silent Night."
(Think "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star" and the Alphabet Song. They both use the same tune.)

No teachers at this school were involved.

http://www.journaltimes.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=3127



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. I just sent a question into the Long Island website and asked them
about the Politician, (named Caman or Kaman - I don't know how to spell it) stopping a priest from blessing a Christmas tree. Is sounds completely ridiculous and if it ever happened in Long Island the politician would have been beat up by the people watching.

This guy just makes shit up. Why doesn't someone bitch enough like they did with Dan Rather and get his ugly ass off the air?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
55. Oh we all know why
Because Dan Rather dared to tell the truth about King George and they couldn't have that so they bitched and whined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
17. I wonder why O'Whiny pulled "Plano, TX" out of a hat to lie about? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
18. Sue him!
The more lawsuits the liar has to settle the more it costs Faux News, and at some point they realize he's not worth it. He's costing them more than he's bringing in. It becomes a business decision. Let him keep those lies getting him in more legal trouble.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
19. Hi, rainbow, I didn't know you were in Plano.
Me too! :hi:

I don't have any kids, so I don't know much about the ISD, but I think it's really funny that this bastion of redness is on the receiving end of an O'Lielly. Presumably, many of the teachers and administrators are Bush supporters and Fox News viewers, and now they are in the position where they have to explain to students and parents that "No, even though Bill O'Reilly said it, it is not true." Maybe some of them will even use the L word--Liar! And I love the request from the PISD attorney for Billy Bloviator to "engage in fair and balanced reporting." Don't mess with the PISD! The people of Plano are very proud of their school district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. No kidding, PISD doesn't like to be jacked with...
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 10:24 AM by rainbow4321
especially on national TV. You read my mind..how funny is it that an area that is one of the top three counties on the "most repuke" TX county list is taking aim at a repuke faux news person??? Plano/Collin County turning off his show could make for quite a DROP in ratings....


:rofl: :popcorn:

I'll keep an eye on other e-newsletters that the district sends out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #27
40. Remember the candy cane brouhaha from a couple years ago?
I think that one even went to court. That's probably why they are responding so swiftly and decisively to this. They just got that mess resolved and they are NOT going to go down that road again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. What was the candy cane brouhaha?
I'm in Plano ISD too (although live in Richardson). My daughter is 4th grade, so perhaps the candy cane caper predates us.

I knew someone who tried to sue PISD over having an elementary school reading group celebration use a Harry Potter theme. There are some real right-wing wackos around here. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Parents sue to allow religious holiday messages in public schools
December 2004

(Court TV) -- Thanks to a last-minute court ruling, Jonathan Morgan was able to share the religious origin of the candy cane with his elementary-school classmates at this year's winter-break party at Thomas Elementary School in Plano, Texas.

Jonathan tried to hand out pens in the shape of candy canes with an explanation of their Christian symbolism at last year's party, but school officials said it was against district policy.

But just in time for this year's festivities, a judge granted a temporary restraining order against Plano Independent School District's policy prohibiting the distribution of items with religious messages. The U.S. Department of Justice is also investigating the case.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/12/27/schoolreligion/

I think the final outcome is that kids are allowed to hand things out before or after school hours, but not during class.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Wow, totally missed that one. Personally, I don't want
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 12:40 PM by moc
some parent coming into my daughter's classroom and discussing anything Christian. I'm Catholic, and I know that the beliefs of some of the more fundamentalist Christian groups are very different than ours.

I agree with PISD on this one. There are ALOT of non-Christians in my daughter's school. I don't have a problem handing out candy canes. I draw the line at someone presenting a discussion about Christian symbolism in the public school.

Edited to add: I received a notice in my daughter's take home folder about the winter party in her class next week. The room mom specifically noted that anyone who brings paper goods, etc must be sure not to have anything overtly Christmas (no Santas or Rudolph) and absolutely no religious overtones. The War on Christmas is being lost in Collin County! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. That's how it always is
Unless it's a party or something. I remember being in school and we couldn't pass things out during class unless it was a holiday like with Valentine's day we used to pass out little cards and have a party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
20. "Disrespecting a federal holiday?" "Christmas kind of people?"
He has a way with spin. A clunky, stupid way. These attempts at framing are just wrong, just so amatuerish, stupid, its amazing he has managed to rile the nutjobs at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Let's see what he does to stop "Disrespecting a federal holiday"

When Martin L. King's birthday comes up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. Oh, he's going to love PISD's website..
Cuz right above the section that has the super again setting O'Reilly straight is this:

'Symphony of Brotherhood' Theme of Jan. 19 Martin L. King Tribute Event
Plano ISD invites the community to join in a "Symphony of Brotherhood" on January 19 at Plano Centre, as hundreds of students join hearts and hands to celebrate the many cultures of PISD. The school district's annual Martin Luther King, Jr., Tribute event will feature music, theatrical performances and awards...


http://pisd.edu/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
57. Sam brought that up when he was on CNN
He made a good point too. You don't see them freaking out whenever his day comes up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
29. I wasn't allowed to EVER wear green or red in HS
Because the uniforms were blue and white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
30. Tons o' stuff from MediaMatters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbernardini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
31. Does green on Thursdays mean you're gay?
I can never remember. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #31
63. That was the story in the '60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
34. Perhaps worse that sexual harrassment suits vs FOX is one about food
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 10:36 AM by havocmom
Fox fired two people who would not change their materal in a story about genetically modified foods ( milk, to be specific, staff of life to many wee people) to please Monsanto, and got fired for their integrity when they threatened to blow the whistle on FOX. They won whistleblower cases, Fox appealed and got ruling overturned.

From beginning of the saga: Case won initailly.
http://www.purefood.org/rbgh/jlistssue.cfm

While an increasing number of Americans suspect mainstream news organizations sometimes twist the news, two veteran investigative journalists say they are ready to prove in court how Fox television managers and lawyers at WTVT Fox 13 in Tampa ordered them to deliberately distort news reports and then fired them for resisting those directives.

The landmark whistleblower lawsuit is believed to be the first time any journalist has ever filed a claim against his own news organization and offered evidence of behind-the-scenes manipulation of the news.

When the trial begins next Monday, reporters Jane Akre (pronounced Ay-cree) and Steve Wilson say they will show exactly how Fox hired them and advertised their reputations for hard-hitting investigations but then folded and pressured them to slant a story in favor of an advertiser who threatened "dire consequences" if their reports were broadcast.

CBS journalist Walter Cronkite and public interest advocate Ralph Nader are both on the plaintiffs' witness list, despite efforts by Fox attorneys who desperately sought to block their testimony.


Saga continues:
http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/courses/geog100/ITT-Akre.htm

Notwithstanding being vindicated in court, I have yet to collect a dime of that jury award. There is no telling how long Fox will drag out the appeals process as it seeks to have the judgment overturned by a higher court. Meanwhile, I am still out of work, as is my husband, Steve Wilson, who was also fired on December 2, 1997, for refusing to falsify a news story to appease the powerful Monsanto Corporation.

The story Fox tried to kill involved rBGH milk, which is produced using Monsanto's recombinant bovine growth hormone. We documented how the hormone, which can harm cows, was approved by the government as a veterinary drug without adequate testing of how it affected the children and adults who drink rBGH milk.

You would think that our jury verdict, with its landmark significance for journalists everywhere, would spark some interest from the news media itself. Instead, the silence has been deafening. One of the biggest names in investigative reporting at one of the best network newsmagazines took a look at our case--and then decided not to do a story. Why not? He deemed it "too inside baseball." Translation: There is an unwritten rule that news organizations seldom turn their critical eyes on themselves or even their competitors.


Here is link to PDF of a petition to deny license renewal to the FL Fox affilate involved filed by Akre & Wilson

http://www.foxbghsuit.com/PetitiontoDenyWTVTlicense.pdf

FOX fought the first verdict, of course, ended up getting it overturned AND was awarded damages! The reporters fired for refusing to lie for FOX & Monsanto were ordered to pay some of FOX's legal expenses!

More of the adventures of FOX fighting against truth, justice & the American way on this one:
http://www.organicconsumers.org/rbgh/fox-news.cfm

8/23/2004


Ironically, the ruling came four years to the very day and exact hour that a jury returned its landmark ruling in the case and a $425,000 award to reporter Jane Akre.

This latest decision stems from a case filed in 1998 by former Fox journalists Akre and Wilson who charged they were pressured to broadcast what they knew and documented to be lies about an artificial hormone injected into dairy cows, then fired when they refused and threatened to report the matter to the Federal Communications Commission.

After a five-week trial in 2000, a jury decided unanimously that Akre was fired solely because she threatened to blow the whistle to the FCC the broadcast of a false, distorted or slanted news report. The panel that found in Akre's favor awarded nothing to Wilson who represented himself at trial.

The Fox appeal was largely on an argument that it is not technically illegal for a broadcaster to deliberately distort the news on television.* The appellate justices reasoned that since state law provides whistleblower protection only for employees who object to misconduct which is against an "adopted law, rule, or regulation" and they decided prohibitions against news distortion are merely a "policy" of the FCC, the reporters' eight-year-old lawsuit must have been without merit from its
inception.


* bold and italics mine to draw your eyes to the outrage

FOX is FAUX and there are court documents to prove it.

edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. Why do things like this still shock me?
Seems we need a new law ... mandating that they tell the truth! Sheesh! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Most people figure others behave based on standards like their own
The liars, cheats, and too many politicians count on that human trait. Most folks are decent enough that they never even consider all the vile and evil things which are possible. When others pull some stunt, we are almost always surprised.

OT: Ever contemplate the words vile and evil? Just different arrangements of the same elements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. Saddly, vile AND evil describe them to a T!
I know I shouldn't be amazed anymore by anything they do ... but that the court allowed that as a defense just boggles my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. FL court, FL laws
My how we keep coming back to Jeb-land isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movie_girl99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
35. how many times has he had to retract
a story because it was bullshit? Is there any way to know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
36. He is such a joke of a being. I couldn't bring myself to call him a man.
Plano schools do have some lame dress code policies, but wearing
green and red at xmas aren't one of them.

Maybe he can talk to * about his strategy for winning the war on xmas.

Say you are winning over and over and the stupid people will believe it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
37. If it costs them any money, they should sue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
38. I sent a letter to Bill!
And here's the gist of what it said....

Dear Bill,

Schools requiring students to not wear clothing that is green or red is nothing new. I graduated in 19XX, and I was never once allowed to wear green or red at school at all in December. The school still won't allow it.

has school uniforms that are blue and white, and therefore no green or red shirts, pants, shirts, sweaters are allowed. The same goes for pictures of Santa Claus and Christmas trees on T-shirts, sweat shirts, and sweaters. Thought you might be interested.

While you're going after , you might want to look into . This should get you started. I'm sure there are others out there.

Keep fighting the good fight on this supremely important issue.

---

These idiots are so wrapped up in this idiocy, they can't see the dumbness for what it truly is. I got a huge laugh from you today and I needed that. I thought I'd feed the fire and hopefully I'll get a mention as an Enemy of Bill who would dare to point out something he should already know especially since he grew up Catholic.

While they're being distracted by this utterly ridiculous non-issue, I'm having fun at their expense, and the rest of us can focus on things that need real adults looking at them. Like the rising unemployment rate, the 30000 people GM is laying off, the people working 3 jobs and still have no benefits of any kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BloodyWilliam Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. That letter is clearly a fake!
Why would you write a fake letter like that? Why do you hate Christmas???

I am of course kidding. :) Geez, O'Reilly's such a fucking psycho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #49
60. And if I get a response
I'll post it. Though I doubt he'll even see it, since I'm not a member of his site and I had to send it to FOX News.

But it was a buncha fun writing it and hitting the Send button. Hee hee hee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
42. Go get em Plano...serve up some crow, piping hot and ready to EAT!
K and R...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
43. Bill will use the superintendent's words as proof they "caved."
I betcha dollars to donuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
44. That's my school district too!
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 12:19 PM by moc
:hi: rainbow

I see many students/teachers wearing Christmas colors at my daughter's elementary school. I missed the O'Reilly controversy though. I don't get Plano ISD ENews.

Plano should ban Fox News. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #44
62. I asked my 14 y/o about it and she goes
"he pulled THAT out of his butt"...one girl at her school is wearing Xmas headbands and even has one that has little springs on it with different Xmas symbols that wave around.

2 things that piss off PISD the most: falling standardized test scores and making national news in a bad way..so making it in a bad way thru something not true is really going to have the person not checking the facts catching a large dose of hell...


Remember how PISD adamantly denied have an athlete steroid problem for the longest time? Then a PISD high school student posed for the cover of Newsweek, wearing a Plano sweatshirt..the cover story was high school steroid use. Weeks after Newsweek hit the national news stands, the district announced that they had hired a new "steroid czar"..hmmm..hire someone for a problem we "don't have". They really don't take to bad national attention.

PISD seems to have fired a shot across the (Fox) bow by getting their attorney involved. If Fox knows anything about the local demographics, they will have O'Reilly issue a retraction ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
51. O'Reilly gives douchebags a bad name..........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
53. the only way to topple O'Reilly is with a defamation lawsuit.
I hope they pursue this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
54. What a wanker. Where does he get this shite?
Way to PISS OFF YOUR OWN DEMOGRAPHIC, asshat. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. Does he use the same story just different school districts?
Cuz look at this:

http://www.wnem.com/Global/story.asp?S=4235657

A Mid-Michigan Township makes national news but there's a problem, local officials say the whole thing was made up.

Bill O'Reilly is making the claim that Saginaw Township officials banned residents from wearing red and green during the holiday season. Local officials say he's dead wrong.


“In Saginaw , Michigan , the township opposes red and green clothing…on anyone, in Saginaw Township they basically said anybody, we don’t want you wearing red or green. I would dress up from head to toe in red to green if I were in Saginaw Michigan .”

WNEM TV-5 Talked to Saginaw Township supervisor Tim Braun who says O’Reilly’s comments are flat out not true. Braun goes on to say the township hall has red and green Christmas lights adorning the building at night.


----------------

Faux News Channel sidestepped the above issue, saying it was a radio station problem..Ok, well O'Reilly's PISD same-song-different-verse was on Fox News Channel. Now what, assholes????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
59. Should sex offender Bill apologize --or just get fired for lying?
I guess it depends on how much Fox cares about its growing reputation for brazen untruthfulness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
64. The school district should send Bill a bill for the employees
time spent not doing their regular jobs but answering stupid phone calls and emails in response to Bill's ignorant statements about the district on his show. Plano tax payers shouldn't pick up the tab for Bill's fabricated allegations and overthetop theatrics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
66. Shouldn't this wanker be on a sex offender list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC