Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT TV critic: new "Nightline" is "ordinary," "flimsy"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:23 AM
Original message
NYT TV critic: new "Nightline" is "ordinary," "flimsy"
Television Review | 'Nightline'
Like Gaul, Divided in 3 Parts
By ALESSANDRA STANLEY
Published: December 13, 2005

It is a little painful watching Cynthia McFadden, Terry Moran and Martin Bashir on ABC's new "Nightline." They look like Kerensky's provisional government right before the October Revolution - well meaning but doomed.

Probably sooner than later, the 11:35 slot that Ted Koppel held on to for 25 years is bound to fall to a late-night entertainment show. And now, there is no real reason to bemoan that loss.

The new "Nightline" isn't terrible, and some of the more recent segments have been quite good. But over all, the revised show is surprisingly ordinary, a flimsy, fast-moving magazine show like "20/20" that omits the kind of sustained, intelligent inquiry that turned Mr. Koppel's "Nightline" into a landmark....

***

ABC News clearly seeks security in numbers. Unable to decide on a single person with sufficient pizazz to replace Peter Jennings, who died last summer, the network settled on two anchors: Elizabeth Vargas and Bob Woodruff. It is a compliment to Mr. Koppel that his bosses figured it would take three people to replace him. But it was fuzzy math, because if Mr. Koppel proved anything it was that less is more. His was a bare-bones operation, with visual effects that were about as dazzling as radio. Yet Mr. Koppel had a gift for asking incisive questions in a conversational tone, then zeroing in on tendentious or contradictory replies with a sneaky follow-up question.

"Nightline's" new anchors are more like United Nations interpreters: they smoothly ask questions, nod knowingly at the reply, no matter how fatuous, then move onto the next topic on their scripts....

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/13/arts/television/13stan.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree. I always watched Nightline when Ted was on.
Now, I usually do a quick check to see what they're covering and move on to something else.

If ABC is determined to have a late night show, I wonder if there's any chance ot getting someone similar to Jon Stewart, or Keith Olberman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yep, It's on borrowed time
I've only watched one or two in the new format and I agree totally with the article. Before that I'd watched it religiously, now there is no reason to. Sorry Ted, I tried, but there's just no there there.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think it's intentional

Some executive was told to dumb it down and jazz it up (I hate the thumping background 'music') in hopes it would drive away the old market for the show so they can say 'well, we tried' and then kill it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. You might have something there .....



I just wonder if ABC is renewing its efforts at wooing Letterman to their network. They tried before but Dave wouldn't have it. He didn't want to be responsible for bumping his good friend Ted. But now that Ted has retired .....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. There's NO effort to continue Koppel's Nightline
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 11:29 AM by Bozita
It died on 11/22.

The "new Nightline" is only distinguishable by its time slot.

The NYT reviewer hit the bullseye.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. The evening shift needs to see that NYT review
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Night line used to do a Friday night special, they did one continuing
series about inner city school teachers that was excellent, it's a shame they've done away with what Night line once was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC