Everytime Bush speaks, we need to have a democrat nearby speaking

As you know, Bush came to Philadelphia yesterday to try and win support for his murdering spree in Iraq. Of course Philadelphia is overwhelmingly blue city, not sure why he would pick us but he did. But an hour after Bush was done, former war-hawk now anti-war supporter Rep John Murtha held a speech in downtown Philly mere blocks away from the spot where Bush spoke.

Results: Now the news not only covered Bush's speech but Murtha's speech was covered at the same exact time.

If Democrats are to succeed we need to plan this at every single public speaking event that Bush does. When he speaks, we show up an hour later and we speak. It doesn't have to be Murtha, but a well known politician in the area that would pick up major coverage just like Murtha did in Philly.

This is how we'll win by giving our counterpoint right there on the spot for the evening news!

after * and before the cameras pack up. that seems to be the only way we will get representation in the media. dems seem like they don't have an agenda because the msm never interviews them! i am SO tired of hearing that we don't stand for anything when, in truth, we stand for the social conscience of the country. we just have (much) less msm exposure than the repugs have.

ellen fl

Then Americans wouldn't have to be force fed GOOBER ranting about 9/11, terra, terrists, Saddam bin Laden, Iraqistanists, Osama Hussein, did I mention 9/11?, objectionists against victory and America and troops, did I mention 9/11?, terra coming to you, stay the course ( :freak: ), not on GOOBER'S watch, Zarqawi wants your head, did I mention 9/11?, etc. etc. etc.

for example...

moron*: we will follow the course!!

translation: I haven't a clue what I'm talking about.

moron*: fight them there so we don't have to fight them here!!!

Translation: I haven't a clue what I'm talking about.

You get the picture.

colossal racist failure*.