Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dear Gov. Dean -- Just dial 1-800-CALL-SPY …

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:04 PM
Original message
Dear Gov. Dean -- Just dial 1-800-CALL-SPY …
15 December 2005 (# 10)

If only it were a joke. But, it’s not.

For starters, the number does not connect you to the Department of Justice or the FBI. Instead, you’re dialing the United States Army "CALL SPY Hotline" to report "incidents" within the Republic.

A part of aging should not include being forced to revisit really stupid, un-Constitutional endeavors of one’s government that one had hoped were vanquished, forever.

From Hoover’s "black bag" and "Cointelpro" operations, including spying on John Lennon and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., we all got an ample dose of the type of government that we then firmly rejected as un-American and immoral.

Through the 60’s, many of us had direct experiences with the un-Constitutional intrusion of various governmental operatives into our efforts to inform our government that it was performing recklessly and brutally and we wanted that behavior to stop.

One almost had the feeling by the mid-1970’s we might be restoring, and even advancing, a progressive agenda within America - an agenda resonant with the ideals of the Founders; with those of Lincoln, Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy.

The systematic dismantling of anything remotely progressive and "American" began in earnest with Reagan’s crew, and thanks to the enormous financial and fanatical influence of Bruce Kovner and his American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the dismantling of “America” has accelerated.

The AEI crew Cheney infused into numerous Executive Branch positions, and the concomitant contamination of a substantial number of members of the US Congress are direct consequences of realizing the AEI militaristic imperial agenda for America. That agenda is orthogonal to what most Americans think their country is and now, tragically, establishes the legal basis for prosecuting America for the supreme crime of waging war of aggression.

More on Kovner in future letter about what must be done to stop Bolton.

For now, I request that you focus on the need to call upon every American citizen to demand that their Senators not only block the current version of the "Patriot Act" (history will record it as the "Tyranny Act", I assure you), but that they severely restructure that legislation as to have it robustly focused on actual threats.

The United States of America defeated Hitler and Hirohito in less time that it has now been chasing a gang of thugs being led by a fellow who ostensibly has kidney failure.

We must not allow the United States Army to spend one dime or one moment scouting Quaker anti-war gatherings like the one in Lake Worth, FL -- a "threat" requiring the attention of the US Army 902nd Military Intelligence Group!!

A secret 400-page Defense Department document obtained by NBC News lists the Lake Worth meeting as a "threat" and one of more than 1,500 "suspicious incidents" across the country over a recent 10-month period.

"This peaceful, educationally oriented group being a threat is incredible," says Evy Grachow, a member of the Florida group called The Truth Project.

More on just how embarrassingly stupid much of the stuff detailed in that DoD document can be found here:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10454316

and, here:

http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2005/12/pentagon_domest.html


William Arkin summarizes it as well as anyone, today:

It is this assumption that everything is potential actionable intelligence that has led to renditions and torture and secrets prisons abroad. Now in the United States, it is contributing to an ever growing domestic military, intelligence and law enforcement triangle. I'm torn between saying that these homeland security goons are a menace and suggesting that perhaps if they are so gung ho they should get on the next plane and employ their fabulous talents in Iraq.

Link: http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2005/12/pentagon_domest.html


Gov. Dean, we need a legislative halt on the "Patriot Act."

We need a major judicial foray into the vast illegal activities of Bush, Cheney, their neoconster fellow imperialists, and those who are financing the destruction of America as law-abiding member of the community of Nations.

Thank you for your continued leadership,



Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cumulative index:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reagan's Administration was the beginning of the end of the world as we
know it.

During her show today, Randi Rhodes was talking about some of the terrible things that happened during his administration. The basic foundations of our liberties were loosened so that the Repukes after him had less trouble totally dislodging them.

I feel like we are on the edge of a precipice. If we don't do something really fast...all is lost. It will all come tumbling down on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush Said to Let U.S. Tap Calls Without Courts
Bush Said to Let U.S. Tap Calls Without Courts

By JAMES RISEN
and ERIC LICHTBLAU

WASHINGTON, Dec. 15 - Months after the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for evidence of terrorist activity without the court-approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying, according to government officials.

Under a presidential order signed in 2002, the intelligence agency has monitored the international telephone calls and international e-mail messages of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people inside the United States without warrants over the past three years in an effort to track possible "dirty numbers" linked to Al Qaeda, the officials said. The agency, they said, still seeks warrants to monitor entirely domestic communications.

The previously undisclosed decision to permit some eavesdropping inside the country without court approval was a major shift in American intelligence-gathering practices, particularly for the National Security Agency, whose mission is to spy on communications abroad. As a result, some officials familiar with the continuing operation have questioned whether the surveillance has stretched, if not crossed, constitutional limits on legal searches.

"This is really a sea change," said a former senior official who specializes in national security law. "It's almost a mainstay of this country that the N.S.A. only does foreign searches."

More at the link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.html?ei=5094&en=22cb502ee0dee292&hp=&ex=1134709200&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print


Totalitarian America is being birthed .... STOP THE "Patriot Act" and begin hauling all these unaccountable violators of the Constitution into court.

The enemy is in full view and its leader is George W. Bush.


Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Update -- "Reports: Bush Authorized NSA to Spy in U.S. "
Reports: Bush Authorized NSA to Spy in U.S.
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 8:06 a.m. ET

NEW YORK (AP) -- The National Security Agency has eavesdropped, without warrants, on as many 500 people inside the United States at any given time since 2002, The New York Times reported Friday.

More at the link:

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Bush-NSA.html?pagewanted=print


Glad to know Senator Hagel is willing to join Senator Feingold and Reid (and others) fillibuster against the "Tyranny Act."


Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. New York Times admits it held domestic spying story for a full year
On the second page of a report which reveals the White House engaged in warantless domestic spying, the New York Times reveals that it held the story for a full year at the request of the Bush Administration, RAW STORY can reveal.

The Times also reveals that senior members of Congress from both parties knew about Bush's decision to spy on Americans who were making international calls or emails, without warrants.

Further, the Times notes that they have omitted information in the article they did write, agreeing with the Bush Administration that the information could be useful for terrorists. Excerpts from the Times' article follow.

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/New_York_Times_admits_it_held_1215.html


Sulzberger and Keller demonstrate even more of their neoconster colors ....


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Dear Gov. Dean -- On Concealing Crimes …
17 December 2005 (# 12)

Beyond the shock of learning that the President of the United States of America violated the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, at a minimum, in authorizing the National Security Agency to spy on citizens, we are informed that:

The White House asked The New York Times not to publish this article, arguing that it could jeopardize continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny. After meeting with senior administration officials to hear their concerns, the newspaper delayed publication for a year to conduct additional reporting.

Link to the NY Times article: http://tinyurl.com/cdvg5


So, we have:

1. the President violates our Constitutional rights;

2. the "White House" conspires to prevent those aware of the crime from reporting it;

3. the "paper of record" willingly suppresses reporting their knowledge of the crime(s);

4. the "paper of record" not just fails to report the crime, but perhaps even had knowledge of it prior to the National Election of 2004 and still did not report it.


The New York Times needs to be investigated.

1. They were willing participants in a disinformation campaign that enabled Bush and the neoconsters to wage war of aggression.

2. They were staunch supporters of a participant in a scheme that damaged our national security by compromising covert intelligence assets and endangering one or more CIA operatives – we only know of Mrs. Valerie Plame Wilson being endangered and compromised. Someday we may well learn of the fate of others.

3. And now, under some flim-flam pretense of not wanting to aid terrorists, they willfully suppressed reporting on an outrageous, repetitive violation of the Constitutional rights of our citizens.


As to Bush, well he just added another set of offenses to his already extensive rap sheet – it is obvious what legal actions should be taken to prevent the Nation and humanity of suffering another moment of his megalomaniacal sociopathy.

Thank you for your continued leadership,


Any question whom Sulzberger, Keller and the NYT Board of Directors report and serve should now be totally obvious.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC