Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just because the illegitimate Cheney believes in it, US is more fascist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 09:26 PM
Original message
Just because the illegitimate Cheney believes in it, US is more fascist
"I believe in a strong, robust executive authority and I think that the world we live in demands it," said Mr. Cheney, who was in many ways the intellectual instigator of the rapid expansion of presidential authority as soon as Mr. Bush came to office.

Today, he made no effort to play down his central role in aggressively seizing those powers, citing his early battle to keep private the names of people he consulted while drawing up recommendations for Mr. Bush on energy policy. That effort was ultimately upheld in the courts.

Mr. Cheney appears to have been the first senior administration official to brief a very small number of Congressional leaders on the program and the underlying technology that has permitted the National Security Agency to find and immediately tap into "hot numbers" - telephone calls and e-mail messages suspected to contain communications between terror suspects in the United States and abroad.

Ordinarily, any tap that includes one party inside the United States has required obtaining a warrant from a secret court that oversees the enforcement of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act - itself an effort to address of the abuses during the Watergate scandal.


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20cnd-cheney.html?ei=5094&en=223fd4492082b73d&hp=&ex=1135141200&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print


That's what it all boils down to: Cheney thinks the world demands a US dictator, Bush is a weakling, ergo the US has a dictator.

Cheney, you repulsive selfish pig. You disgust me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. He hasn't got many facts right
He repeats utter falsehoods, makes bad predictions and has a caveman's view of civilization.

Why should anyone trust HIS judgement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The US is totally fucked up after just one Bush term.
That's evidence enough Cheney is an idiot as well as a bully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Compare the views of a legal scholar with those of Big Dick
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 09:35 PM by BurtWorm
"Some legal questions are hard," Professor Stone said. "This one is not. The president's authorizing of N.S.A. to spy on Americans is blatantly unlawful and unconstitutional."

Mr. Cheney, unsurprisingly, took the opposite view, noting that he has been expressing his views on the subject as far back as 1987, when, as a Republican member of Congress from Wyoming, he contributed to the minority views in the Congressional report on the Iran-contra affair.

"Part of the argument in Iran-Contra was whether or not the president had the authority to do what was done in the Reagan years," he said. "And those of us in the minority wrote minority views that were actually authored by a guy working for me, one of my staff people, that I think are very good at laying out a robust view of the president's prerogatives with respect to the conduct of especially foreign policy and national security matters."

Asked if the proper balance had been restored under Mr. Bush, he said, "I do think it's swung back."



Not too eloquent, are you, Dickie boy? But we get the picture. You're an ignorant rube with power. That's about the disheartening (so to speak) size of it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Such brazen hypocrisy.
citing his early battle to keep private the names of people he consulted while drawing up recommendations for Mr. Bush on energy policy.


He battles to keep his buddies out of any investigation, then, subjects citizens (anyone else not his buddy?) to surveillance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. So very true.
Excellent observation! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC