Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Warner on the floor Discussing General who dissed Islam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:54 PM
Original message
Senator Warner on the floor Discussing General who dissed Islam
Calling for an investigation :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure investigate that, but not the CIA leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Bioth are important
for different reasons, but they are critical... at stake, what
Boykin did, places good order and discipline in question.

Now this only tells me the shit storm that has hit DC is of
impressive proportions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sessions is acting very uneasy about Warners request
Durbin now Speaking ....

Comending Warner's comments on the general .
Important questions must be answered .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:58 PM
Original message
Warner thinks that the General should be assigned different duty
while the investigation goes forth .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah.. he should be demoted to private
Edited on Tue Oct-21-03 05:10 PM by HawkeyeX
and manning the radio tower in Alaska by the end of the day. Mail him his clothes.

A quick :beer: if you can identify the movie with that quote. (Except for the private part - I made that up)

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopthegop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. investigate what?
has no one heard of the first amendment? is there an accusation this General has misused his power? the Constitution forbids any religious tests for office...requiring him to have a given opinion about a given religion would be a religious test...

up to his superiors to handle if necessary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good point
I don't know what exactly we could "investigate".

However, I do know that it is definately not in our best interest to have a hardcore, right-wing Christian nutcase lead a campaign against a predominately muslim area. Free speech is nice, but I think he puts our country in danger when he refers to the war as a Godly action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. not a freedom of speech issue
when one holds certain high offices - esp in the military - part of one's job is diplomacy and not reflecting poorly upon the office; moreover if one's exercise of free speech makes the job harder to do (by creating more hostility on the ground, and perhaps inadvertantly instigating some actions against those on the ground), then it can present an even bigger problem.

He, and anyone else holding a similar post, is well aware of this.

In terms of 'superiors' that is a good question - what is the technical relationship between congress and the armed services? just the checkbook (and oversight?) just fiscal oversight? I am not really clear on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopthegop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Congress provides the money
but the President commands...not Congress...President is the only civilian (and sec of def and other presidential appointees) who 'outrank' military
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. He said what every non-Muslim believes about Islam
And every Muslim believes each non-Muslim religion is false too. The reason he is in trouble is because what he said was divisive and further damaged America's standing in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. You are protected under the First Ammendment
Edited on Tue Oct-21-03 05:13 PM by nadinbrzezinski
The General is not, his oath of office includes
protection of the US Constitution, his statemetns actually
subvert that as he made the statement that this is a
Christian nation.

Secondly, as a member of the Armed Forces he is not suposed
to make official statements for the Army (He was wearing
a uniform) unless authorized by his chain, care to guess who
his chain is? (Undersecretary for Intelligence, it is VERY SHORT)
If he spoke official policy, then this is the view of the WH.. now we
know.

By his actions he has also egnaged in conduct unbecominig an Officer
of the US Army

he has also subverted the words of his Commander in Chief (remember trumman fired McCarthur for somethign very similar)

Since soldiers cannot engage in politics, if he is NOT punished, then
the lowest private can now engage in Politics, while in uniform.

Unless you have contact with the military, as the military likes to
put it, you woudl not realize this, common saying and the truth.

You and I are behind the Constitution, he stands in front of it.

I hope this clarifies this for you

Oh and incidentally if he said exactly what he said wearing civvies and he was never identifed as an active member of the US Army, then he enters the gray zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopthegop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. ok...we disagree
think whether the people upset (here, elsewhere) would be upset if you changed the religion in question to Christianity or Judiasm...seems unlikely..

have a good evening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. My husband is in the navy
Edited on Tue Oct-21-03 05:17 PM by nadinbrzezinski
as I have stated before, he sat there shocked, not because
of what he said, but becuase the man was engaging in
politics WHILE IN UNIFORM.

I think you really have no idea what I am talking about, and
for the record, if my husband said the same thing, just replace
Jewsish for Christian, he would be drummed out of the service,
for violating the UCMJ....

Again, at least those of us with connections with the military, this is not a gray issue or freedom of speech, but a UCMJ issue and this one is pretty clear cut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. There Are....
...also regulations relating to what can and cannot be said by a service member in uniform. As well as regulations on when and where the uniform is to be worn.

And just to give you a little information, freedom of speech in the military is not a right. If all soldiers were allowed to say what they wanted to then it would adversely affect the discipline and well being of the units.

It is also against regulations for military personnel to wear their uniform at any kind of political rally showing support for any candidate.

The general is free to practice what ever religion that he adheres too, but he is not free to make comments about other religions or their practice in a public forum that is the opposite of what the President has said.

And as always the US military must remain above both the political and religious fray. All military personnel swear an oath to "Support and Defend the Constitution of The United States", this means that the general has sworn to defend Christians, Jews, Muslims, Wiccans, and any other religion that is practiced in this country.

If he is allowed to continue to make his statements without being corrected can you imagine the effects that this would have on the military as a whole.

The oath means that you will defend all, no matter if you agree with what they believe in. When you put on the uniform you don't get to pick and choose who or what part of the Constitution you'll defend, you have sworn to defend all of it.

I don't like what groups like the KKK or Aryan Brotherhood espouse, but I will defend their right to say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. He isn't doing this out of outrage
He is doing it because Virginia has a relatively large Muslim population and he is trying to appeal to them. The Virginia GOP actually ran a Muslim for the state legislature. I don't know if he won but actions like that are why we must not take the Muslim vote for granted. Remember, most Muslims, like most other people, vote based on domestic issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I don't care what is the reason
Boykin has to be reasigned as the investigation unfolds
and he has to face teh music
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC