Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anna Nicole Smith and the Bush Administration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:35 AM
Original message
Anna Nicole Smith and the Bush Administration
I know there are legal reason why the Bush Administration is helping Anna Nicole Smith. However, does any think the Solicitor General guy is hoping to get laid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Huh?
Helping her how? What did I miss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Heard this on GMA this am
Jonathan Turley said it involved the bankruptcy law, so there is a real reason for the Bushies to get involved. But it does make you want to laugh. If this had happened in the Clinton Administration...:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is there any way we can get Anna Nicole Smith into the WH to
serve her country and orally service that idiot and get him impeached? I'd love to hear her talking about it in an interview on Entertainment Tonight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. A homosexual prostitute was given full access to the WH Press room
on Bush's watch, and we didn't even hear a peep from the so-called "moral majority".

Bush getting a BJ from a porn queen won't get any reaction, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. WTF is this about???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. This on the CNN site
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/12/26/scotus.roundup.ap/?section=cnn_showbiz

snip

The issue before the high court is one only lawyers would love: when may federal courts hear claims that involve state probate proceedings. Smith lost in Texas state courts, which found that E. Pierce Marshall was the sole heir to his father's estate.

The Bush administration's filings in the case are technical. Without getting into the details of the family squabble, Solicitor General Paul Clement said that the justices should protect federal court jurisdiction in disputes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. So the Bush Administration is yet again trampling on state's rights
does that about sum it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think bush is
more heavily medicated than her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC