Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stupidhead said we're not leaving Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:22 PM
Original message
Stupidhead said we're not leaving Iraq
Stupidhead also said that we were going into Iraq in order to neutralize the threat of Saddam. Saddam seems to have been neutralized. Why are we still in Iraq? Or has the mission crept, and the American people not been notified? Are we entitled to an explanation, or is that a trick question which Lil George will refuse to answer, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChompySnack Donating Member (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Look out
He always says the opposite of what is true. I guess we are going to abandon it now, that is the roumor anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ha ha!! STUPIDHEAD! HA Ha
Edited on Wed Oct-29-03 05:34 PM by Champion_Jack
good one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nationbuilding, apparently - but the real reason is oil
Personally, it's to guard the oil wells so nobody can light them ablaze. If oil wasn't there, we'd have gone home by now to let them rot.

Oil, heh. The same oil Bush once said would be used to pay for his thoughtless incursion. Yet he asks for $87 billion, only $20 bil of which will be used in Iraq. Looking at even half of that, Time magazine saw the fuzzy math:


the Time article http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101031006/ (then click on "Behind the Price"), you're not going to like this partial listing of Bush's continuing, costly, mistakes:

$1 BILLION
To train Iraqi police and fire fighters
The Complaint: The Administration fought a $200 million increase for America's police and fire fighters (my editorial: Bush, as usual, gives not a frick about Americans and his obvious fleecing here proves he's doing this for his business bedtime buddies. x( )

$400 MILLION
For two new jails
The Complaint: With a proposed 4,000 beds in each prison, the U.S. would be spending $50,000 per inmate. (my editorial: That's a lot of prisoners. Given how W likes to lay down the law, he'll probably need 5 million more beds... or maybe 10 million and ship a bunch of accused, 'guilty-before-proven-innocent-and-even-then' "enemy combatants" over there too... )

$100 MILLION
For a witness-protection program for 100 Iraqis and their families who would testify against former regime officials or suspected terrorists
The Complaint: The U.S. federal witness-protection program took in about 250 witnesses and their families last year at a total cost of $31.5 million (my editorial: More fleecing, didn't anybody in power bother to look this up for themselves? I mean, THAT'S THEIR JOB. Just like the Patriot Act, never read it either...)

$5.7 BILLION
On electricity, including $1 billion to rehabilitate and replace the power infrastructure over several years
The Complaint: Compare spending $255 on electricity generation for every Iraqi with 71¢ a person spent on federally funded electricity work here at home (my editorial: More fleecing, how much more obvious will Bush* get?!)

$2.1 BILLION
To import petroleum products and invest in oil infrastructure
The Complaint: It doesn't make sense for the world's second largest oil-producing country to import the stuff (my editorial: This one is sheer STUPIDITY. Of course, this is the W* regime at work and I bet his oil buds will profit from this needless exercise... )

$303 MILLION
To repair railroads and rehabilitate three major airports as well as the port of Umm Qasr near the Kuwaiti border
The Complaint: The port is already functioning (my editorial: If it's already functioning, then this $303 mil is more fleecing. )

$150 MILLION
For a new children's hospital in the southern city of Basra
The Complaint: The total cost could reach $700 million (my editorial: More typical Bush, what do you expect? )

$20 MILLION
For executive job training
The Complaint: A four-week management class would cost $10,000 a person (my editorial: Just like in the US, Iraq will have lots of well paid executives and underpaid people who do the frigging work. Time for us to UNITE... )

$1 MILLION
To build a museum documenting atrocities by Saddam Hussein
The Complaint: Is this really necessary? (my editorial: Propaganda-fest, pure and simple. Somehow, the museums they used to have containing artifacts of human history were far more relevant, and far more important. Indeed, when Bush allowed the old museums to be looted, he didn't order the troops to stand in to protect them - much like how he allowed nuclear facilities to go unguarded as well. In that aspect, I'm not blindly supportive of the troops, not when they're "just following orders" (from an "unimpeachable" source, no less though impeachment is the least he ought to get...). But I still want them to get fed and hospital care paid by the system, not by themselves like Bush has them doing. In this aspect, I strongly support the troops. Bush doesn't support anybody except his corporate friends. ) To be fair, the links go to Google search results. They had given SOME valid results at the time of writing, but the internet is never always the same...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oil? No, it can't be that!
The Oregonian newspaper said back in February after thousands of citizens marched against this illegal and wasteful invasion that the folks carrying the "No Blood For Oil" signs were naive. Since the Oregonian is never wrong (or at least they haven't published a retraction or a correction), it can't be oil we're after in Iraq. And since Saddam, the original object of Stupidhead's desire, isn't there anymore, there must be another reason.

Whatever could it be???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Stupidhead!! Ha! I use to call my brother..........
stupidhead! But it fits bush much better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC