Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What kind of voting machines will be used in the Democratic primary?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 08:52 PM
Original message
What kind of voting machines will be used in the Democratic primary?
When we vote for our candidates in the primary, will we be using the same voting machines made by Diebold, the ones with no ballots and no way to do a hand recount? Will they be touch-screens with secret proprietary code? Is there going to be a paper trail in the primary election? It looks to me that some states will be close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. It'll be different state-by-state (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightinNewDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Depends on your state
...or city or county. The law varies widely.

In New Hampshire, mechanical, touch-screen and punch card ballots are all prohibited under state law. Municipalities must utilize either an old-fashioned paper ballot, or one of two optical scan systems, Accuvote or OptiScan. Both systems use a fill-in-the-bubble approach, similar to what you see on a standardized test like the SAT, PSAT, MBE, etc.

The scan ballots have worked well. The count is quick and accurate, and it has actually made cheating far more difficult notoriously crooked places like Londonderry (where the GOP routinely fudged the count) and Manchester's Ward 6 (where the Dems would rig the machines to help down-ballot hack politicians).

In the district where I live, there was a recount for a legislative seat last year. The recount, which utilizes a pure hand count, largely validated the machines. The minor errors that did show up were due to flukey things like a ward clerk writing a "1" that looked like a "7" to a bleary-eyed city hall tabulator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC