Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anybody see the Kelly hearing on C-SPan?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-03 06:00 PM
Original message
Anybody see the Kelly hearing on C-SPan?
A Parliamentary committee was interviewing Kelly on his contacts with the British media...carried live on C-Span.

From what I can tell this guy really wasn't a big source...maybe more of a "technical" source. He was pretty nervous, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrfrapp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-03 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Source?
You're going to have to clarify what you mean. If you're asking whether he was a big source to Andrew Gilligan, then I would have to say no. Kelly certainly didn't think he was and neither did the Parliamentary committee. Was he however, a big source with regards to WMD, then I would have to respond with a resounding yes.

There was literally nothing this guy didn't know about Iraqi weapons programmes in the 90s (in fact, he carried the unfortunate distinction of being personally hated by Saddam Hussein). Quite simply, Dr Kelly is of supreme importance. Whether he will prove to be more significant with regards to the Anthrax episode however, remains to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-03 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That what I mean
I dont think, based on this hearing, that he was a major source for Gilligan.

From just this hearing he seemed like more of a "backrounder" source on the WMD program and bio WMDs in general....more for technical backround.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrfrapp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-03 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Okay.
"From just this hearing he seemed like more of a "backrounder" source on the WMD program and bio WMDs in general....more for technical backround."

This hearing was called specifically to establish whether Dr. Kelly was the Deep Throat character to Gilligan. It was not a technical role he was playing here, but a (unwilling) political one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC