Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A note on the Qusay Ubey thing, and the proper stance on it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:03 PM
Original message
A note on the Qusay Ubey thing, and the proper stance on it
First off, in my opinion, there should be none of this talk about conspiracy or assassination. These two guys were just plain old bad. They aren't the type of people we should EVER be defending or complaining over.

The proper way to handle this?

Here's my take on it:
Wow, it's really great that they got those guys. But, was getting a 1 day headline about taking out two bad guys really worth 1 billion dollars a week? Is it worth 1 soldier a day? Where are the WMD? What happened to them? The President still lied. What's the deal with this CIA guy who's wife had her cover blown out of intimidation? Isn't that a federal crime?

I think the press corp is on to all of these things. FINALLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. My feelings exactly!
A bit early to :kick:, but oh well; a good thread deserves it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do you beleive that the charred bodies were that of Uday & Qusay?
I'm not quick to beleive anything that comes from bu$hco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Like Saddam, they may put out their own videotape.
Dead or not. I don't care and I don't think it matters that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. perhaps one charred body was in a wheelchair?
and a gold plated one at that? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Right on!
Now get that message out!

Don't let the freeps say "this is a bad day for us"!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nobody ever suggested...
...that Uday and Qusay didn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. bush* is a fool if he now gives $30 million to saddam's cousin...
seems that bush* minions plan to hand out $15 Million reward for each body, and since it was saddam's cousin that supposably turned them in...for 4 charred bodies, $30 Million is a lot of money...OUR tax dollars at work...

this is almost as foolish as the $28 Million that bush* gave to the Taliban as foreign aid in May 2001, which no doubt provided the funds for the 9/11/2001 attacks....bush* is a really slow learner...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. correction: bush* gave $43 million to Taliban in May 2001 (link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. That is a very weak arguement.
To say that the importance of "getting" these guys was a photo op will not work on freeptards. I think that tactic is way more tacky than you are claiming the idea that Bush wanted them rubbed out is.

The correct response is to say that we believe in the rule of law and would prefer to see people like these subjected to the justice system in their own country where their alledged crimes occured and where the victims of those crimes deserve justice through due process.

Of anything killing them in a 4 hour gun battle where they were outnumbered 20 to 1 makes them sound like Davie Crocket not the criminals they are alledged to be.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. You're calling his arguement weak? Hah!
No, the correct response is not to defend these henchmen. You do it if you want to but it's ridiculous to expend any good will on these thugs. You go your way and hopefully the rest of DU will go SGR's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. I agree completely and would add North Korea
Edited on Tue Jul-22-03 07:41 PM by gulliver
They could kill Saddam's whole family, but what does it do to make my family safer? Nothing. It's a distraction.

Russert said that North Korea might have 10 nuclear bombs by the end of the year. That's 10 more than they had under Clinton.

Those bombs are the elephant in the room that no one seems to have fully appreciated. Just what we needed. All thanks to George the Idiot and his crew of geniuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. IF they got them...
Let's not be TOO hasty...

Remember they had Saddam AT LEAST twice... and don't even talk to me about Osama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. I watched...
...all three network nightly news programs, and was pleasantly surprised that, with all the news of the day...Saddams sons, Jessica Lynch, Eiffel Tower, and more...each still had the 16 words in the news. More damning then ever. On NBC they even implicated Condi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC