Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gays and lesbians made progress under Clinton?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Some Moran Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:05 PM
Original message
Gays and lesbians made progress under Clinton?
The same Clinton who supported DOMA?

The same Clinton who caved to Sam Nunn and Colin Powell to support Don't Ask Don't Tell?

The same Clinton who supported sodomy laws while governing Arkansas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
carrowsboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. uhm yeah
You prefer the old days of Ronnie Raygun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have to admit
but would it have been any better under a Republican administration? At least it wasn't blown off the face of the Earth by a Republican.

However, I was really sad when Clinton signed DOMA. But it would have been overrriden by Congress since they had enough votes for it. Even Wellstone voted for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Some Moran Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wellstone only caved three times...
DOMA, DMCA, "Patriot" Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. :wow:
DMCA and 'patriot' act rather surprise me, given their fascist natures.

He did regret voting for DOMA, but if you ask me he regretted it only AFTER he discovered the backlash against him by a faitly sizeable GLBT community. People seemed to think he was a liberal... Maybe he was.

I wonder if he regretted voting for DMCA and 'patriot' act as well.

Why did he vote for them in the first place?!

But, in the end, it's a reminder - how trustworthy are politicians?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Some Moran Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hmmm...
Everybody voted for the DMCA: They were victims of misinformation from the entertainment industry. (The fact that Kucinich is close with a lot of them, while Dean is more in favour of cyber liberties is a big deal to me.)

Patriot Act? I dunno...Probably blackmailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hold It
Regardless of legislation or the lack of it, what Bill Clinton did was start a dialog.

How many openly gay characters did you see in Prime Time network TV before Clinton?

How many openly gay politicians?

Clinton's faux pas with the military was the best thing to happen for gays who wanted to come out, outside of San Francisco, Boston & NYC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Spin spin spin
DOMA was a compromise; either that, or a constitutional amendment might have gone though.

Don't Ask Don't Tell was a compromise; either that, or you wouldn't have gays in the military at all.

I don't know about the sodomy laws, but my guess is that if the legislature of Arkansas ever tried to overturn those, he probably would have signed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. IS there any question that gays were better off in 2000 than in 1992?
Bill Clinton was the first President to address a gay organization.

He appointed the first openly gay ambassador and the first openly lesbian head of a federal agency.

He signed executive orders banning discrimination based or sexual orientation in federal hiring, adding orientation discrimination to the prohibitions included in Title IX, prohibiting the IRS from discriminating against gays, including orientation as a category under which refugees can ask for asylum, and banning providers of health insurance to federal employees from discriminating against gays.

He used his veto threat to block Congress from banning gays and lesbians in DC from being allowed to adopt.

I did not agree with him on "Don't ask, don't tell" or the Defense of Marriage Act, but on balance, he was by any measure the best President gay Americans ever had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Log Closet Republicans are very fond of this "argument."
"Clinton was reponsible for DOMA and DADT, so he was worse than the Republicans."

Of course, 99% of GLBT's have the good sense to see the Log Closet crowd for what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Some Moran Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I never said that the Repukes were better...
I just said that Clinton wasn't especially great for gays.

Hell, Trudeau did more 25 years before Clinton did anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. President Trudeau? I don't remember him/her.
Did you mean Gary Trudeau, who had Mike Slackmeyer and his lover come out? Or did you mean Pierre Trudeau, former Prime Minister of Canada? Last time I checked, Canada was a very different country than the USA. Far less jerk per square mile ratio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Some Moran Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Far less progressive per square mile too, ironically...
Our population isn't very dense...lol

Trudeau went from life in prison to legalisation almost immediately after being elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I love Canadians
Edited on Tue Nov-04-03 08:34 PM by JackSwift
If the geography weren't so frickin' cold, I'd be one. Eh? Canadians and Kiwis are simply the finest people on this goofy globe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes. In spite of what you mentioned....
Yes, GLBT people made progress under Clinton. Clinton signed the executive order that eliminated discrimination based on sexual orientation for all federal workers. Clinton appointed gays and lesbians in his administration...chiefly Roberta Achtenburg as Assistant Secretary of Housing and James Hormel as ambassador to Luxembourg.

More importantly...Clinton listened to us. He met with gay and lesbian activists at the White House. He appointed a White House liasion to the gay community. For the very first time, Clinton made gay and lesbian people feel a real part of the American fabric. Maybe it sounds naive, but Clinton began to ensure that GLBT had a place at the table.

God knows Clinton wasn't perfect. He DID sign DOMA. He did cave in to DADT (I thought it was a big mistake to start with that one. Clinton should have pushed ENDA first).

But, oh my God. He NEVER would have referred to us as "sinners". Unlike the current occupant of the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. There is a gay and lesbian revolution going on in America
and Bill Clinton paved the way for it. Yes, the real bows are to be taken by the activists fighting for gay and lesbian causes, but that is how it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yes. Definitely. Wanna know why?
Supreme Court Justices Steven Breyer & Ruth Bader Ginsburg - the gifts that keep on giving!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC