Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now lead article in NYTimes:Iraq Made 11th Hour Appeal to Avert War!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 08:56 PM
Original message
Now lead article in NYTimes:Iraq Made 11th Hour Appeal to Avert War!
http://nytimes.com/2003/11/05/international/worldspecial/05CND-INTEL.html?hp

November 5, 2003

Iraq Made 11th-Hour Appeal to Avert War, Intermediaries Say

By JAMES RISEN

WASHINGTON, Nov. 5 — As American soldiers massed on the Iraqi border in March and diplomats argued about war, an influential adviser to the Pentagon received a secret message from a Lebanese-American businessman: Saddam Hussein wanted to make a deal.

Iraqi officials, including the chief of the Iraqi Intelligence Service, had told the businessman that they wanted Washington to know that Iraq no longer had weapons of mass destruction, and they offered to allow American troops and experts to conduct an independent search. They also offered to hand over a man accused of being involved in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing who was being held in Baghdad. At one point, the intermediary said in an interview, the Iraqis pledged to hold elections.

The messages from Baghdad, first relayed by the intermediary in February to an analyst in the office of Douglas J. Feith, the under secretary of defense for policy and planning, were part of an attempt by Iraqi intelligence officers to open last-ditch negotiations with the Bush administration through a clandestine communications channel, according to people involved in the discussion.

The efforts were portrayed by Iraqi officials as having the approval of Saddam Hussein, according to interviews and documents.

The overtures, following a decade of evasions and deceptions and a number of other attempts to broker last-minute meetings with American officials, were ultimately rebuffed. But the messages from Baghdad raised enough interest that in early March, Richard N. Perle, an influential adviser to top Pentagon officials, met in London with the Lebanese-American businessman, Imad Hage. According to both men, Mr. Hage laid out the Iraqis' position to Mr. Perle, and he pressed the Iraqi request for a direct meeting with Mr. Perle or another representative of the United States.

more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is HUGE!!
:wow: :wow: :wow: :wow: :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Is This Why The MEMO CRAP SURFACED AT NEWSMAX?
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 10:30 PM by cryingshame
I swear, I think they tried to float that Dem Intelligence Committee Memo to blow smoke over this.

Frankly, I think Junior MADE THE DEAL with Saddam and just had the Invasion anyway for the television footage.

So he could be Wartime President.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Blockbuster...
Could be - but the Rethugs will spin it that Hussein couldn't be trusted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Perle botched peace again?????????
He should be strung up by his gonads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Why is Perle involved with this at all?
He's not a government official. He's just a guy with an agenda and a seat on the Defense Policy Board, NOT a government agency but more of a lobbying organization for the defense INDUSTRY. Why is PERLE meddling in affairs of state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. That's what I really don't like
unelected people and neocon think tanks running the foreign policy of the U.S. This USED to be a democratic republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. So the Bush administration engineered diplomacy to fail.
And by this deduction, the Bush administration ordered the murder of Iraqi citizens. This also means that every soldier killed in this operation only has Bush's hunger for war to blame. The diplomatic process was not exhausted. Yet, Bush himself gave the order to initiate hostilities, bringing us to where we are now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. From the very start
This is one reason why Bush is such an inveterate liar. The whole run up to war, there was never a chance at diplomatic solutions. Every time he said so, he lied.

The agenda was set, the PNAC blueprint was on schedule.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Too easy
This is not a big deal, it seems to me.

One of the arguments of the neocons was that Saddam had said he would do this or that but then didn't.

The only way it could possibly mean anything, it seems to me, is if the Hage guy had documents which could prove Saddam's pledges were likely true.

And even then, Saddam is the tyrant du jour that we no longer want to prop up, so any claims would be quickly discredited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. So much for...
Bush exhausting all diplomatic means to prevent war. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sistersofmercy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. IMO heaps of dirt will come out eventually.
Traced back to Reagan and Papa Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. the sub-story is interesting here
Who leaked all these emails and documents to Risen at the NYT? And what would the leaker's purpose be?

Is this another CIA dump?

Strategic thinkers, put your minds to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Actually, the CIA does not come off well in this article.
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 09:36 PM by flpoljunkie
Perhaps someone in the State Department? No, probably not.

Or someone who used to work in the office of counterterrorism in the White House, perhaps? Or ex-CIA?

Or the obvious choice, Michael Maloofm the analyst who worked for Douglas Feith, in the secret Office of Special Plans in the Pentagon.

"It is unclear if Mr. Durnan's (Wolfowitz's chief of staff) boss, Mr. Wolfowitz, was informed of the messages that were being relayed by Mr. Maloof. (In May, Mr. Maloof, who has lost his security clearances, was placed on paid administrative leave by the Pentagon.)"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I don't know if it's a CIA dump
because Perle is blaming the CIA for not taking the deal.

Mr. Perle said the C.I.A. officials said they did not want to pursue this channel and indicated they had already engaged in separate contacts with Baghdad. Mr. Perle said the response was simple: "The message was, `Tell them that we will see them in Baghdad.' "


Saddam was an evil, evil man. He was part of the axis of evil. He was killing his own people. He was a brutal dictator. He was killing the Kurds. He wouldn't let the inspectors inspect. He needed to be removed from office. How many people did you want him to kill before we took him out? He had WMD. He had nuclear weapons capabilities and on and on and on it will go. Excuse after fucking excuse. They will spin their way out of this. Do you really think any Democrats will pick this up and run with it? They should but won't. Just watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Unfortuantely...
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 09:25 PM by incapsulated
This will be spun as "he wasn't trustworthy, not a real representative, we talked but they're all liars and cheats etc. etc."

I don't see it going anywhere.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm SHOCKED and I'm AWED!
Bush wouldn't talk turkey with Sadaam because he thought he was going to kill Sadaam in the opening strike of the war. Guys, our military has been working without a plan ever since that first bombing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annxburns Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. The only thing this could be used for ...
.... is to insist - INSIST that the white house release the Iraq war documents. The timing of this is interesting. We get a supposedly dem memo stolen and then this leaks ....

Independent investigation time ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. The US could have done this
If Sadaam opened the doors and let the US in, Bush could still have kept troops massed at the borders as insurance.

Jeeze if the rest of the media got off their butts and covered it could be a big deal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuckeFushe Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. I DISTINCTLY REMEMBER BUSH GIVING SAADAM 48 HOURS
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 10:30 PM by BuckeFushe
TO COMPLY. I HAVE TO FIND THE SPEECH.

THIS IS HUGE



THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THIS WILL REVERBERATE WORLDWIDE. He slaughtered the Iraqis and killed our soldiers when he had the chance to back away from this nightmare.

FOUND IT

Bush: Saddam and His Sons Have 48 Hours to Leave

Tuesday, March 18, 2003

In a poignant and powerful address to the nation Monday night, President Bush articulated, “Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq within 48 hours.” Failure to comply “will result in conflict,” he warned, admonishing that inspectors and journalists should pack up and leave immediately. “We have come to the final days of decision.”

one of many links to speech
https://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/3/17/213602.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. this belongs in LBN
This is enormous.

And in the back of my mind I recall someone mentioning this obliquely. Was it Joe Wilson? Or Larry Johnson? Or Jay Rockefeller?

SOMEONE said weeks ago there was a back channel effort by Saddam to stop the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spunky Donating Member (469 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. If this is true, why is anyone surprised?
As I recall, the Taliban made a last-ditch effort to turn over Osama as well, and Dubya turned that down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuckeFushe Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
21. Bump
needs to be read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. NY Daily News: "U.S. official" says Perle has created "wild stories"before
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/story/134279p-119692c.html

Hage said the Iraqis also offered to cooperate in fighting terrorism, fully support any U.S. plan in the Mideast peace process, give the U.S. "first priority" on Iraqi oil rights and even hold elections.

Importantly, the Iraqis also promised to hand over Abdul Rahman Yasin, who has been indicted in the U.S. in connection with the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, according to reports by ABC News and The New York Times.

"They were prepared to go anywhere to talk, to cut a deal," Hage told ABC.

CIA bigwigs later told the Iraqis to take a hike, according to Perle.

One U.S. official told the Daily News that Perle "has created these wild stories before, but he has never been disciplined. This looks to be another round of finger-pointing within the warring administration fiefdoms. The President really needs to put a stop to this," the official said.

Other sources suggested Perle may be trying to take some of the heat off himself by speaking up about the alleged peace overtures. He's among a group of hawks now being blamed for overstating how big a threat Iraq was to U.S. security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. KICK IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC