Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A) Would Bush do it? B) Would it work?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kyrasdad Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:00 AM
Original message
A) Would Bush do it? B) Would it work?
Seeing the numbers are falling fast for Bush, do you think that if he knew of an impending terorist attack he would allow it to happen, the thinking being it would rally Americans around him or would he stop it?

Would the attack have the desired effect, or would it casue people to ask what happened to the intelligence much sooner than in the case of 9/11?

My POV... I hope to Goddess he'd stop it. But I don't think he would, and if he didn't, I think the majority of American people would turn on him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think the regime is divided on a second Unity Operation

Some remember those 90 somepm approvals, and others wonder if it would look like he wasn't doing a good job on Homeland Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dobak Donating Member (808 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. yes, he would stop it...
3 reasons

1 - Another attack would make him and his admin look bad
2 - Stopping an attack would make him and the PATRIOT act look good
3 - He is a bad president, but he is not that bad

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. HA! Uh .... you're joking, right?
either that or you wanna get banned really quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why not? Worked the first time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. What Cat Atomic said... (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. no, no, no. Here's what he's gonna do
He's going to CREATE a "terrorist attack" where he then STOPS it.

You know, like a kid who starts fires, calls the fire department, puts out the fire, and then gets patted on the back and called a hero?

I knew a kid that did exactly that in the University of Missouri Library. He was a rabid right-winger and a member of the KKK. He was doing work/study as a security guard. LOVED the uniform. Finally got busted after "finding" the third or fourth suspicious fire. His father worked in right-wing Missouri politics and was close to Kit Bond.

That's what George Bush is gonna do. Mark my words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MI Cherie Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. They keep telling us something could happen again ...
... and who actually benefited from their incompetence before?

He is hiding the August '01 memo. If it proved he wasn't informed of an impending attack, wouldn't it have been released (or leaked) by now?

They have to keep the paranoia and fear up. Isn't the "Threat Level" still the same? They will probably raise it sometime before the election and then claim to have stopped something MAJOR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. they would definitely do another LIHOP
I'm surprised it hasn't happened already. But they probably figure a 4-month gullibility gap for the public this go around, when the creature in the white house will get a popularity blip. So look out come next July-August.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Stop it & brag about it.
If they are able to. America is a huge country, easy to infiltrate. A terrorist attack on an important target would be very easy, except that the terrorist mostly defeat themselves by a concentration on targets of high symbolic value.

If terrorist ever got smart/stupid, the whole world would be in trouble. By that I mean smart enough to really hurt us and stupid enough to do it. I don't mean nukes either.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC