New New York Poll puts Liberman on top

OK people. I do not like the sound of this. Liberman is coming in on top of the Democratic primary in New York now.

Undecided 19 (16)
Lieberman 17 (13)
Dean 15 (17)
Clark 12 (18)
Kerry 11 (12)
Sharpton 11 (6)
Gephardt 9 (5)
Edwards 3 (4)
Braun 3 (6)
Kucinich 1 (2)


Whatever happens, I will not vote for Liberman.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x8796.xml

sorry, I edited it.

and Lieberman is from Connecticut.

You got it.

Nice to see you.

;))))))))))))

Forget about world rulers. Octafish, blm, and UTUSN *seriously* need to be in charge of the world for the WORLD's sake.

On Edit: I might add, and I will, that La Serpent's threads are very ingratiating. Thanks.

My guess is that they want Lieberman to run against Bush.

My motto: I'll vote for a tree before I vote for a Bush.

Even Lieberman. Holding my nose.

it's a NY poll

From October 29 -- November 3, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,304 New York State registered voters, with a margin of error of +/- 2.7 percent. The survey includes 483 Democrats, with a margin of error of +/- 4.5 percent.

This was a poll of New York State voters, its not a national poll.

I will vote for him if he is the nominee.

Lieberman is not going to get the nomination.

Bottom line!

John

from non-traditional sources...like maybe Halliburton.

can't stand.

How will he debate? I voted for your war and your tax cuts but....?

but voted AGAINST both Bush tax cuts.

Hey I don't like him either, but let's give credit where credit is due.

I need to be better informed of him.

Lieberman will be gone by Super Tuesday. If he can't win Arizona or Oklahoma then he'll probably drop out. Besides, he has no grass roots support.

You made me feel better. I'm from NY and that was a depressing poll.

As the Ox in Animal Farm said: ...must work harder...

I assume Dean is really on top there...

must be something wrong with the methodology.

I'm being serious. Lieberman just doesn't have that
kind of momentum, buzz, or media play.

If a set of statistics don't make common sense, don't
believe them.

When you think about how they benefitted from the mutual fund & other Wall Street scandals and how the level of greed that they attained through the boom times distanced them from Liberal values, I really don't think that they have the commitment to a Democratic platform that we need to see in these troubling times.

That doesn't make any sense to me.

I expect a lot from the NY Times but not this. Lieberman is toast!

Take him out of the toaster and spread butter and jam on him. He is done!'


John

So you don't like Lieberman? Big whoop. His "lead" is well within a 4.5% margin of error, and Undecided is still the winner. Then you've got to factor name recognition into the mix: Sen. Clinton wins by a landslide, but she's not running. Holy Joe still has some leftover credibility from his stint as Gore's #2. This will diminish, as he loses the Iowa and New Hampshire primaries.

But the BIG news here is bush*s 63% disapproval rating in NYC. Just IMAGINE what the Repuke convention is going to look like! Pure insanity. The RNCC is going to stomp into a place where their candidate is out of favor, 2-to-1, to dance on the graves of thousands of New Yorkers. That isn't going to play well. A large segment of that 63% is going to find time to make a public statement of some sort.

Also worthy of note is bush's 55% disapproval among indy voters.

If the RNCC is thinking they can pick up New York in 2004, they've got a lot of expensive bribing and propaganda to do between now and then.